Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Sat May 30, 2015, 11:02 PM May 2015

Good grief I am tired of Outlander's dark gloomy violence.

A little goes a long way with me. I just read an article in which Sam Heughan says it is going to get even darker next year? If so, then they may have get darker without me. I have not started the 2nd book even though I ordered it a few months ago.

How the heck much darker and violent can it get than it has been for weeks?

Very disappointed.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good grief I am tired of Outlander's dark gloomy violence. (Original Post) madfloridian May 2015 OP
Really? That stinks. Silver Gaia May 2015 #1
Honestly... a lesson these producers need to learn... hlthe2b May 2015 #2
The last 2 episodes were almost unwatchable RockaFowler Jun 2015 #3
I haven't watched any of Outlander DawgHouse Jun 2015 #4
It may all be in the book....so.... FarPoint Jun 2015 #5
or do like I do. I DVR it, and fast forward through the gruesome stuff SoCalDem Jun 2015 #6
Indeed... That's what I did. FarPoint Jun 2015 #7
We did that, too. Silver Gaia Jun 2015 #8
Yep, I did a lot of fast forwarding the last 2 episodes. madfloridian Jun 2015 #10
Diana does enjoy writing the dark stuff. tavernier Jun 2015 #9
I agree about the Emmys AwakeAtLast Jun 2015 #11
I've only read the first book, getting ready to start the 2nd. madfloridian Jun 2015 #14
Hm, I'm into book 5 now, but I don't recall anything getting any darker than that.... DebJ Jun 2015 #12
She tortures Roger pretty good as well... tavernier Jun 2015 #13
The last episode was probably the most extreme, horrible thing I've ever geek tragedy Jun 2015 #15

Silver Gaia

(4,539 posts)
1. Really? That stinks.
Sun May 31, 2015, 05:57 AM
May 2015

The last two episodes were horrible. I have loved most every episode of this show up until these last two episodes. All that rape and torture in the dungeon was just too much! We didn't need all of that to understand what happened! sheesh. That's NOT what I watch this show for. Starz and Ron Moore had better wise up. They're ruining a good thing. (I also could care less about seeing the bad guy full frontal--just gross.)

I haven't read the books. Was this described the same way in the novels (drawn out graphic rape and torture)? Maybe so, but I just can't imagine it. This was worse than some horror shows! <gag>

hlthe2b

(102,119 posts)
2. Honestly... a lesson these producers need to learn...
Sun May 31, 2015, 08:10 AM
May 2015

Last edited Sun May 31, 2015, 12:16 PM - Edit history (1)

some details are best left to the imagination. Uggh. Too much!


On edit, after finally getting through the (DVR'd) finale, after three stops/starts, I am heartened they end it on a happier note... Heavens, though..

RockaFowler

(7,429 posts)
3. The last 2 episodes were almost unwatchable
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 08:49 AM
Jun 2015

I can't re-watch either of them.

I thought it was better just leaving it where it was at the beginning of the last episode. We didn't need to see all of that. The torture alone in Jamie's mind would have been enough for me.

I'm glad it had a somewhat happy ending, though. It's the only redeeming quality of the whole episode.

Not sure about next year being darker:
http://deadline.com/2015/05/outlander-finale-spoilers-season-2-ep-ronald-d-moore-diana-gabaldon-1201434415/
It's going to be a lot different in France

DawgHouse

(4,019 posts)
4. I haven't watched any of Outlander
Wed Jun 3, 2015, 02:49 PM
Jun 2015

but I know that the violence was hard to read about in the books. It was very graphic!

FarPoint

(12,287 posts)
5. It may all be in the book....so....
Mon Jun 8, 2015, 07:19 PM
Jun 2015

That said, it just gave me stress....I think it could of been translated with much, much less graphic information. I may or may not watch next season.

FarPoint

(12,287 posts)
7. Indeed... That's what I did.
Wed Jun 10, 2015, 01:52 PM
Jun 2015

I love the story and characters... Just don't need all the intimate violence to understand. It's depressing basicly.

Silver Gaia

(4,539 posts)
8. We did that, too.
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 06:31 AM
Jun 2015

I don't think we could have made it through the episode at all without fast forwarding through that crap!

tavernier

(12,368 posts)
9. Diana does enjoy writing the dark stuff.
Wed Jun 17, 2015, 05:23 PM
Jun 2015

The TV version is Sesame Street compared with what she does to some of her characters in the books (and I've read them all twice). She has a sadistic streak, for certain.

The problem is, when she's not PMS-ing and hormonal (oh shut up, I'm female and know of which I speak), she fleshes out some damned fine characters and gives them some damned interesting things to do.

The future episodes will have major highs and lows; that I can promise you. But I would stick around if only to keep enjoying the fantastic acting and chemistry between the three main characters. I think there are Emmy's in their future.

AwakeAtLast

(14,122 posts)
11. I agree about the Emmys
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 10:56 PM
Jun 2015

They are some of the bravest actors I've seen in a while. Very rare to see historical brutality portrayed so realistically.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
14. I've only read the first book, getting ready to start the 2nd.
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 07:34 PM
Jun 2015

I guess such dark violence is easier to read than watch. The toughest parts I could read through enough to get the drift, but still get the essence of the characters. So I guess I did not pay as much attention in the book, but the way it dwelled on the violence and humiliation on TV got to me.

I was looking for that interview I mentioned in the OP, didn't find it. But I did read that Sam got drunk to get through those scenes. Much of the crew stayed away.

Sometimes I wonder at what price someone must get across their view that violence like that exists? I really do wonder at the need for it, other than it's what Diana G. wants.

DebJ

(7,699 posts)
12. Hm, I'm into book 5 now, but I don't recall anything getting any darker than that....
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 09:20 AM
Jun 2015

but then, Jack Randall's need to totally subjugate and crush Jamie seems to me to be the absolute darkest possible thing any human soul could want......you know, like the Koch Bros et al.......I'm not actually kidding there....they have no need of money, so clearly crushing as much of humanity as possible via financial strangulation and deprivation of an increasing number of basic human needs is a sport to them and their cohorts... I see Jack Randall as a symbol for them. Such incredibly hideous life forms have always existed among the human race, and still do; it is just the methods they use that alter a bit with time, technology, and the particular civilization...methods that are more subtle....and do seem to include a desire to have the victims adoring them as well.........

The darkest parts were psychological, in my opinion...and that truly is the central point of this...and Jamie's responses over time throughout the books. I think the TV version did an excellent job portraying this, and most of the violence was implied, not explicitly shown.

As I've read the books, I realize how truly comfortable humanity is (in this country) these days, compared to human existence in other periods of history. None of the violence I have read in the books seemed gratuitous, but rather, simply the unavoidable reality of living in those times and those places. It makes me realize how fortunate I am to have been born in the time and place that I was.

If anyone else has read the books and recalls what Sam Heughan is referring to, could you please PM me? I'm way too far into book 5 to go back and flip through book 2. The last 300-400 pages of any of the Outlander Books is just too exciting for me to ever put down. This must be what a crack addict feels like. Diana's writing is exquisite. Her knowledge of so many things...various cultures, history, medicinal practices, horticulture, and so many other tidbits she has in her books continues to amaze me. And if I could stop reading long enough to google some definitions, I would have added a large number of words to my vocab...not so many as to be overwhelming, but more, intriguing...guess I'll do that on a re-read. I never re-read, but I can see me doing it with these books. They are spectacular.


The first time it was on my tv, I was hurriedly preparing to leave for a family emergency, while my hubby and a friend watched it in the other room. I kept hearing sounds of horror from them...rushed into living room to see...OMG it was 2 men kissing! Come on, this is 2015! Given that I knew the story line, having read the books, and they did not, when they started with this extreme response to that, I suppose that made me toss aside their other reactions later.... there were similar responses from them for other things as well on the TV screen, which showed actually very little, but intimated much more.

tavernier

(12,368 posts)
13. She tortures Roger pretty good as well...
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 02:51 PM
Jun 2015

😂😂 Poor guy couldn't catch a break in one of her books!

Not to mention what she does to the pirate.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»TV Chat»Good grief I am tired of ...