Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Two Sunset (SF) Families May Lose Their Apartments Due To Shady Landlord Tactic
http://sfist.com/2016/01/13/two_sunset_families_may_face_no-fau.phpTwo separate groups of Sunset renters are at risk of losing their apartments after what appear to be some shady moves by the building's new owner. One of the renters has filed an appeal, and is hoping that added scrutiny on the matter will allow both her and the elderly couple living upstairs a chance to remain in their rent-controlled homes.
The property at 2523 34th Avenue was purchased this past October for $850,000, notes Socketsite, and consists of an in-law unit downstairs and a two-bedroom apartment upstairs. Socketsite notes that "[within] a few days [of the purchase], an anonymous complaint was filed with the City, reporting a 'suspected' illegal in-law on the ground floor of the home."
The city then gave the new owner a building permit to address the complaint, which in this case would mean the removal of the in-law's kitchen — rendering that unit unlivable and thus turning the entire building into a single-family dwelling. As soon as the property becomes a single-family dwelling, it is no longer subject to rent control. As such, the elderly couple upstairs would likely face a rather large rent hike.
Removing an in-law unit to revoke a building's rent-controlled status is not a new technique, although it is a particularly loathsome one. We saw a similar thing happen in Bernal Heights last spring when a landlord allegedly bullied out one of two tenants and then argued that technically it was always a single family, and rent control no longer applied.
The property at 2523 34th Avenue was purchased this past October for $850,000, notes Socketsite, and consists of an in-law unit downstairs and a two-bedroom apartment upstairs. Socketsite notes that "[within] a few days [of the purchase], an anonymous complaint was filed with the City, reporting a 'suspected' illegal in-law on the ground floor of the home."
The city then gave the new owner a building permit to address the complaint, which in this case would mean the removal of the in-law's kitchen — rendering that unit unlivable and thus turning the entire building into a single-family dwelling. As soon as the property becomes a single-family dwelling, it is no longer subject to rent control. As such, the elderly couple upstairs would likely face a rather large rent hike.
Removing an in-law unit to revoke a building's rent-controlled status is not a new technique, although it is a particularly loathsome one. We saw a similar thing happen in Bernal Heights last spring when a landlord allegedly bullied out one of two tenants and then argued that technically it was always a single family, and rent control no longer applied.
