Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 12:29 PM Oct 2014

Oakland plowing a path for urban farming on vacant lots

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Oakland-plowing-a-path-for-urban-farming-on-5835728.php

After four years of planning, the city is poised to eliminate bureaucratic roadblocks for urban gardeners, making it easier for residents to turn the city’s 3,000 vacant lots into fields of arugula and marigolds....

Until now, gardeners could raise vegetables on vacant lots, but they needed a permit if they intended to sell those veggies, either at farmers’ markets, to restaurants or even to neighbors. Conditional use permits could cost up to $3,000 and take up to six weeks to obtain...

The city’s hope is that more community gardens and urban farms will reduce blight around vacant properties, provide jobs and bring fresh produce to areas with few grocery stores, officials said. The City Council’s Community and Economic Development Committee is slated to look at the updates this week, and the council will probably vote on the issue Tuesday.

“If someone wants to grow corn, tomatoes or whatever, that’s fabulous. We as a city should enable that, or at least not get in the way,” said City Councilman Dan Kalb, who’s worked on the issue.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oakland plowing a path for urban farming on vacant lots (Original Post) KamaAina Oct 2014 OP
+1 pinto Oct 2014 #1
Good for Oakland NV Whino Oct 2014 #2
What's with the $3,000 conditional use permit? That's a huge charge for growing a garden. shraby Oct 2014 #3
If I read it correctly, the intent is to change that barrier. pinto Oct 2014 #4

shraby

(21,946 posts)
3. What's with the $3,000 conditional use permit? That's a huge charge for growing a garden.
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 02:26 PM
Oct 2014

Why not just give out permits, no charge and improve those vacant lots. Win-win.

pinto

(106,886 posts)
4. If I read it correctly, the intent is to change that barrier.
Tue Oct 21, 2014, 02:39 PM
Oct 2014

Plus give a property tax cut to the lots owners if they agree to a five year urban garden use.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Oakland plowing a path fo...