Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rurallib

(62,406 posts)
Fri Oct 17, 2014, 12:19 PM Oct 2014

Joni Ernst Cites Her Religion As Reason She Would Vote For A “Personhood” Amendment to U.S. Constitu

Note: I have permission from blogforiowa to reprint this
http://www.blogforiowa.com/2014/10/17/joni-ernst-cites-her-religion-as-reason-she-would-vote-for-a-personhood-amendment-to-u-s-constitution/

Joni Ernst thinks her religion should be everyone else’s public policy.

Ernst told the Sioux City Journal editorial board on Wednesday that she would support a federal “personhood” measure if she were elected to the U.S. Senate. “I will continue to stand by that. I am a pro-life candidate, and this has been shaped by my religious beliefs through the years,” she said. “So I support that.”

A “personhood” amendment to the U.S. constitution would give not just a late term fetus “personhood” rights, but also would bestow “personhood” upon a moment-after-conception fertilized egg.

Ernst awkwardly attempted to downplay it to the SCJ editorial board saying, “we don’t have consensus” (like don’t worry, it’s not gonna happen!). But if she were to be elected, there is little doubt that she would be voting yes on a “personhood” amendment as soon as Republicans bring it up in congress which you can bet will be immediately. She did already cast a vote for a fetal “personhood” amendment in the Iowa legislature in 2013. In any event, how much sense does it make for a candidate to defend her position on an issue by arguing that it’s never going to happen anyway?

There is a wide range of implications to “personhood” that frequently go unmentioned. A “personhood” amendment would not just make safe, legal abortions unavailable in the U.S. – with no exception for rape and incest – it could also affect the legality of birth control, such as emergency contraception and the IUD. And the implications of this potentially go beyond making some common convenient forms of birth control illegal, to a woman potentially being charged with manslaughter for having a miscarriage. Yes, I agree, that sounds crazy, but has that stopped Republicans, the Kochs, ALEC, yet? The “stand your ground” laws seem crazy too, but a kid carrying Skittles was deemed enough of a threat that a gun-toting man got away with murder. The voter ID laws seem crazy too but they are happening.

Ernst herself has admitted that she owes everything to the Kochs so let’s not pretend she would represent anyone other than herself if, God forbid, she ever made it to Congress. This is a short but very interesting video.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Joni Ernst Cites Her Religion As Reason She Would Vote For A “Personhood” Amendment to U.S. Constitu (Original Post) rurallib Oct 2014 OP
I'm so fuckin' tired of these loonies. nt valerief Oct 2014 #1
I always find it hard to believe that they believe this crap rurallib Oct 2014 #2
Her supporters hear her say "Pray for us" to them IADEMO2004 Oct 2014 #3
prayers for the preyers rurallib Oct 2014 #4

rurallib

(62,406 posts)
2. I always find it hard to believe that they believe this crap
Fri Oct 17, 2014, 12:40 PM
Oct 2014

That they are merely repeating canned line with no thought what it truly means. She is a true classic in this case.

IADEMO2004

(5,554 posts)
3. Her supporters hear her say "Pray for us" to them
Fri Oct 17, 2014, 01:19 PM
Oct 2014

but she is saying "Prey for us" to the Kochs and other 1%.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Iowa»Joni Ernst Cites Her Reli...