Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Kansas judge strikes down the state's new congressional map
This is from Marc Elias
Link to tweet
https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/kansas-congressional-redistricting-challenge/
Kansas Congressional Redistricting Challenge (Rivera)
Rivera v. Schwab
Filed: February 14, 2022
Decided: April 25, 2022
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Lawsuit filed on behalf of Kansas voters and the organization Loud Light against Kansas’ new congressional map. The plaintiffs argue that the new map, which was enacted after Republicans overrode Gov. Laura Kelly’s (D) veto, is a partisan gerrymander that favors Republicans and dilutes minority voting strength in violation of multiple provisions of the Kansas Constitution. Specifically, the plaintiffs argue that the Republican map drawers explicitly set out to gerrymander the state in their favor by splitting up Wyandotte and Douglas Counties, the state’s two Democratic strongholds and heavily minority counties, and “submerging” their populations into heavily white and Republican districts. The resulting map allegedly contains non-compact districts that do not respect political boundaries or communities of interest. The lawsuit asks the court to block the enacted map and order the creation of a new plan that complies with state law. The case was consolidated with Alonzo v. Schwab. After a trial was held in early April, the judge struck down the congressional map for being a partisan gerrymander that benefits Republicans and dilutes the voting strength of voters of color in violation of the state constitution.
Rivera v. Schwab
Filed: February 14, 2022
Decided: April 25, 2022
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Lawsuit filed on behalf of Kansas voters and the organization Loud Light against Kansas’ new congressional map. The plaintiffs argue that the new map, which was enacted after Republicans overrode Gov. Laura Kelly’s (D) veto, is a partisan gerrymander that favors Republicans and dilutes minority voting strength in violation of multiple provisions of the Kansas Constitution. Specifically, the plaintiffs argue that the Republican map drawers explicitly set out to gerrymander the state in their favor by splitting up Wyandotte and Douglas Counties, the state’s two Democratic strongholds and heavily minority counties, and “submerging” their populations into heavily white and Republican districts. The resulting map allegedly contains non-compact districts that do not respect political boundaries or communities of interest. The lawsuit asks the court to block the enacted map and order the creation of a new plan that complies with state law. The case was consolidated with Alonzo v. Schwab. After a trial was held in early April, the judge struck down the congressional map for being a partisan gerrymander that benefits Republicans and dilutes the voting strength of voters of color in violation of the state constitution.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
This excerpt gets to the heart of the matter:
...is a partisan gerrymander that favors Republicans and dilutes minority voting strength in violation of multiple provisions of the Kansas Constitution. Specifically, the plaintiffs argue that the Republican map drawers explicitly set out to gerrymander the state in their favor by splitting up Wyandotte and Douglas Counties, the state’s two Democratic strongholds and heavily minority counties, and “submerging” their populations into heavily white and Republican districts.
F***ing Republicans. 
