Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
Mon Aug 25, 2014, 11:27 AM Aug 2014

Labor-Backed Assembly Candidate Initially Supports ‘Right to Work’ Law

Ross Barkan

She may have the endorsements of just about every influential labor union in New York City, but one Democratic Assembly candidate said she was ready to support a law that observers say is crippling unions nationwide.

Rebecca Seawright, an attorney and front-runner for an Upper East Side and Roosevelt Island-based seat, insisted in a televised debate on Friday that she would support making New York a “right to work” state, though it was not immediately clear if Ms. Seawright understood that the law bars union contracts from requiring non-union members to pay fees for representation.

“I think [New York] should be a ‘right to work’ state and I would totally support that,” Ms. Seawright said in a response to a question from rival David Menegon.



Read more at http://observer.com/2014/08/labor-backed-assembly-candidate-initially-supports-right-to-work-law/#ixzz3BPykxCoy

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Labor-Backed Assembly Candidate Initially Supports ‘Right to Work’ Law (Original Post) hrmjustin Aug 2014 OP
She better get an education real fast, or get out of the race. Historic NY Aug 2014 #1
I wonder where they get candidates sometimes. hrmjustin Aug 2014 #2
Got to wonder if there is an assumption rurallib Aug 2014 #3
I think some of these unions that endorsed her have some explaining to do. hrmjustin Aug 2014 #4
and they may want to look at their process for endorsing rurallib Aug 2014 #5
Yes ghis is true. it is better to risk annoying a candidate than to find out you made a big mistake. hrmjustin Aug 2014 #6

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
1. She better get an education real fast, or get out of the race.
Mon Aug 25, 2014, 11:47 AM
Aug 2014

didn't understand the question, come on she's an attorney or not a very good one.

rurallib

(62,406 posts)
3. Got to wonder if there is an assumption
Mon Aug 25, 2014, 12:03 PM
Aug 2014

that if you are seeking a seat as a democrat, you by definition support unions and their issues.
Wonder what else we miss? SS, medicare etc?

Seems like someone should have asked a simple question a while back.

rurallib

(62,406 posts)
5. and they may want to look at their process for endorsing
Mon Aug 25, 2014, 12:16 PM
Aug 2014

sometimes people don't want to seem the fool and ask the questions that seem like they don't need to ask. Sometimes they find out later they should have asked them.

I learned long ago to ask the obvious question just to make sure. I have gotten some questioning looks, but I have also been surprised a couple times.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
6. Yes ghis is true. it is better to risk annoying a candidate than to find out you made a big mistake.
Mon Aug 25, 2014, 12:18 PM
Aug 2014
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New York»Labor-Backed Assembly Can...