New York
Related: About this forumBack to the vintage voting machines in NYC ...
it made me feel warm and cuddly. Swinging that three foot lever back and forth really makes you feel like you voted! I didn't realize they were doing that.
I was the 2nd voter in my ED: de Blasio, Stringer, Brewer, Squadron.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)aka a soft pencil and a piece of paper.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Although my precinct does use paper ballots, they still are scanned through a voting machine although it would probably be hard to rig them since a hand count, if there was a close election, would show a discrepancy if the machines were being used to cheat.
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)Here in the US, you could be voting for a dozen different races and a long list of referenda, and people want an immediate public count for all of them.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)And what they got is an immediate private count with propriety software.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)I'd love to find an old one to buy on eBay.
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)Didn't you love that clicking sound? Really makes you feel like you made a phone call!
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)My comment was meant to be nostalgic, nothing more. I had no problem with the scanned ballots (except, perhaps, for the print being a wee bit small).
But thanks for the reply.
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)...if they need to go to a runoff, they'll need to know the new candidates by next week.
State says they MUST go back to scanned ballots for November.
They went back to levers because of how time consuming (putting aside how potentially fraud prone via ballot definition file manipulation) reprogramming the scanners are.
And that "clicking" comment you made above. It reminds me of a rep from New Yorkers for (un)Verified Voting, who helped push for electronic voting, when she said she "knows" hers vote was counted by the scanner because the screen on the machine said so. How "verified" is that?
There are criticism to make of the NYC BoE, but "they're too incompetent to count paper ballots" is suggesting an ignorance about the process. Very few jurisdictions count paper ballots, even to audit. Rather, it's the machines that do while we sit back and assume everything is OK.
And it's not.
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)...is that in the event the scanned count was too close, they couldn't reliably hand-count the paper ballots in time, to know whose names to program into the machine.
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2013/07/nyc-board-of-elections-finds-nearly-1600-brooklyn-ballots-never-counted-in-nov
Wilms
(26,795 posts)So it's another advantage they have.
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)requiring election workers to give out paper ballots.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Will it be a rate much different than scanners break? And when the scanners are ten years old...LOL!
And about those emergency paper ballots. Will they be hand counted?? Or run through trade secret software?? That is THE distinction.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)Now if only they'd do that in the general when the scanners will be used.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)I remember when I was a kid my mom would take me to vote and I would love to pull the lever.
This was the first time I got to use one for my own vote.
Kablooie
(18,612 posts)Here in CA we always have had to fill in circles with an ink stamp.
We've never had the electronic screens either.
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)...when they replaced them with the "state of the art" punch card machines in the 60s.
Javaman
(62,504 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Voted de Blasio, Stringer, James, and K Thompson for DA.