Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

North Carolina

Triana

(22,666 posts) Wed Oct 8, 2014, 10:15 AM Oct 2014

Thom Tillis' Hideous Record On Issues that Matter to Women

More: https://nc.kayhagan.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/FactCheck_Women1.pdf

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Thom Tillis' Hideous Record On Issues that Matter to Women (Original Post) Triana Oct 2014 OP

"So and so is too extreme for the people of (insert name of locale) in (insert year)" merrily Oct 2014 #1

there is a reason that Tillis is running 4-5 points behind her. littlewolf Oct 2014 #2

Thom Tillis' - Us and Them mindset.... DemoJohnNC Nov 2014 #3

merrily

(45,251 posts)

1. "So and so is too extreme for the people of (insert name of locale) in (insert year)"

Reply to Triana (Original post)

Wed Oct 8, 2014, 10:19 AM

Oct 2014

could be used by almost every Democratic candidate against almost every Republican candidate anywhere in the US in any election.

Let's trademark it!

littlewolf

(3,813 posts)

2. there is a reason that Tillis is running 4-5 points behind her.

Reply to Triana (Original post)

Wed Oct 8, 2014, 12:00 PM

Oct 2014

DemoJohnNC

(2 posts)

3. Thom Tillis' - Us and Them mindset....

Reply to Triana (Original post)

Mon Nov 3, 2014, 08:24 PM

Nov 2014

I've listened to as many recordings of thom as I've been able to find and in the vast majority of his discussions where positions on various topics are the norm, there seems to be a Mit Rhomney "us and them" attitude.

I've brought this topic up in several face to face discussions that no one else really seems to see. Till is' tone has more status differentiation in it that the more moderate GOP members suggesting the wealthy and poor as the status symbols and the poor, fixed income, or other undermined minority being his target to obliterate.

Anyone else seen this?

Reply to this discussion