Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,919 posts)
Mon Nov 25, 2013, 08:24 PM Nov 2013

Build 777X outside Washington? It would be illogical, analyst says

If the choice about where to build the 777X is really about Boeing's bottom line, two recent communications, one from a union coalition and the other from an aerospace analyst, contend Washington state remains the best choice.

Aerospace analyst Richard Aboulafia, in his monthly letter Monday, contends that, “From an industry and economics standpoint, the (777X) line will stay in Puget Sound.”

But then he adds that much about the situation isn’t logical. In fact, Aboulafia says he’s no more able to figure out the psychology behind Boeing’s thinking than Dr. McCoy (the doctor in the original "Star Trek" series and latest movies) could be a bricklayer.

“Dammit, I’m an industry analyst, not a psychologist,” Aboulafia writes. “That’s really what it comes down to.”

As an industry analyst, Aboulafia is still betting on Everett, giving it an 89 percent chance of winning the 777X — an updated version of the 777 that's already built there. Aboulafia gives just 10 percent odds for the only alternative site he takes seriously, North Charleston, S. C.

“But with the psychology of fear and loathing driving any part of the decision, numbers like these are largely meaningless,” he writes. “And I’m not a psychologist…”

http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2013/11/25/analyst-unions-say-everett-best-for.html?ana=e_du_pub&s=article_du&ed=2013-11-25&page=all

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Build 777X outside Washington? It would be illogical, analyst says (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2013 OP
Landing an embiggened 747 carrying 787 body parts pscot Nov 2013 #1
There is an anti-union psychosis going on in their boardroom KeepItReal Nov 2013 #2

pscot

(21,024 posts)
1. Landing an embiggened 747 carrying 787 body parts
Mon Nov 25, 2013, 10:19 PM
Nov 2013

on a 6000' runway 8 miles short of where they were going is illogical too. And yet...

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
2. There is an anti-union psychosis going on in their boardroom
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 12:42 AM
Nov 2013

That defies business sense.

They have back orders on planes and are making profits, yet they act like the have to cut costs at the expense of their workforce in Washington state.

That South Carolina operation has proven to be subpar and not logistically feasible. And yet Boeing management acts like they can make planes somewhere other than Washington state.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»Build 777X outside Washin...