Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,103 posts)
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:42 AM Feb 2014

Texas A&M targets Washington brewer over '12th Man' trademark infringement

Plans for a Seattle Seahawks Superbowl celebration with 12th Man beer fell flat after Texas A&M lawyers intervened to protect their trademark.

A family-owned brewery in Bothell, Wash. planned to sell "12th Man Skittles IPA" on Superbowl weekend but canceled the plans after receiving a cease-and-desist notice from A&M, which has trademarked the phrase. A&M lawyers actively police unlicensed uses of the trademark, which have increased with the Seahawks' run to the Super Bowl.

Bothell is a town of about 34,000 located about 20 miles northeast of Seattle. The brewery is operated by Jim Jamison and his family, who have full-time jobs but run the business on the side from property in a residential area. It's only open on Saturdays from noon to 4 p.m.

The 12th Man Skittles IPA was thought up somewhat last minute by Jamison as a way to celebrate the Seahawks' 12th man tradition and star running back Marshawn Lynch's affinity for the candy. He brewed 5.6 gallons of the beer, which isn't even a full batch, with home brew equipment.

More at http://www.theeagle.com/news/a_m/article_562541d6-be7b-5d23-affc-40dc41015040.html .

Cross-posted in the Texas Group.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas A&M targets Washington brewer over '12th Man' trademark infringement (Original Post) TexasTowelie Feb 2014 OP
Geez, I'm not a football fan but that's pretty crummy. yewberry Feb 2014 #1
Trademarks WILL be protected no matter how small the infraction jmowreader Feb 2014 #2
Yes, that's true. yewberry Feb 2014 #3
Fuck Texas A&M! We won the Superbowl! Aristus Feb 2014 #4

yewberry

(6,530 posts)
1. Geez, I'm not a football fan but that's pretty crummy.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 01:24 PM
Feb 2014

A big university is going after a homebrewer for 'diluting their brand' with 5 gallons of beer?

Well, bless your heart, Texas A&M.

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
2. Trademarks WILL be protected no matter how small the infraction
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 05:23 AM
Feb 2014

Consider: if they don't go after this company, someone else with more nefarious designs (maybe another SEC school) will infringe and use the Aggies' failure to enforce the trademark as grounds to have it negated. It's happened before.

The sad part of this whole situation is, if they would have called the Seahawks headquarters and asked about licensing the term, it could have been taken care of quickly and easily.

yewberry

(6,530 posts)
3. Yes, that's true.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 09:56 PM
Feb 2014

But it does seem way over the top. If the dude had known about the licensing fees to begin with he would have known not to try to use those magic words for 5 gallons of homebrew.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»Texas A&M targets Was...