Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Wisconsin
Related: About this forumState has spent $149,000 in GTAC mine-related costs
http://www.ashlandwi.com/news/article_d1d93ae6-b458-11e3-9fff-001a4bcf887a.htmlThe Wisconsin Department of Natural Revenues has fully allocated the $100,000 provided by Gogebic Taconite (GTAC) under state law for mine-related expenses between July 1- Dec. 31, but the state appears to be no closer to releasing dollars for the local community impact committees.
According to a letter released Monday by the DNR, the department has spent a total of $146,895 in eligible expenses to evaluate the proposed iron ore mine on the Penokee Range of Ashland and Iron County.
According to Ann Coakley, Director of the Bureau of Waste Materials Management of the DNR, under state statute GTAC paid out the initial $100,000 in June of last year.
In her letter to GTAC geologist Timothy Meyers, Coakley delivered a cost accounting that included $75,973 for permanent salaries, $36,912 in fringe benefits, $2,382 in travel expenses $1,251 in supplies and services, $6,384 in other expenses and $10,018 in indirect costs.
In the letter, Coakley requested that GTAC make their second payment authorized in the state mining statute of $250,000.
Coakley said Monday that the DNR would make periodic requests for funds of GTAC up to the maximum of $2 million authorized in the statutes.
GTAC submitted their first $100,000 with their bulk sampling plan and preapplication notice back in June, and now we have encumbered that money and told them to send the next check, Coakley said.
Coakley noted that the structure which funds local mining impact committees is separate from the DNR, and to her knowledge, that board hasnt even been appointed yet.
That is a matter that provides a certain amount of frustration for Ashland County Chairman Pete Russo, who notes that the county could use some of the mining impact money to pay the mining-related bills that have begun to pile up.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1180 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
State has spent $149,000 in GTAC mine-related costs (Original Post)
hue
Mar 2014
OP
digonswine
(1,485 posts)1. I heard on WPR-
that recovering these costs should be easy from GTAC--that is telling when a company is eager to pony up like that.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)2. Wouldn't it be better/cheaper to just give Geobic a few hundred million dollars?
In exchange, they could not dig the mine and pollute our waters.
hue
(4,949 posts)3. I'm sure they would take the $$ AND dig the mine & pollute our air, land & waters
even tho they would promise not to after taking the money.
Yipee! It's the 1% way!!