Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Wisconsin
Related: About this forumFederal judge won't put voter ID ruling on hold
http://www.jrn.com/tmj4/news/Federal-judge-wont-put-voter-ID-ruling-on-hold-271140901.htmlMADISON, Wis. (AP) -- A federal judge has denied a request by Wisconsin's attorney general to put on hold his decision blocking the state's voter identification law from taking effect.
U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman on Wednesday denied Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen's request for a stay of his April order blocking the photo ID law. Adelman says he is denying the request because Van Hollen's likelihood of winning the case on appeal is low.
Van Hollen's spokeswoman Dana Brueck declined comment.
Van Hollen has appealed to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and asked it to also lift Adelman's injunction blocking the photo ID requirement. That appeals court has given opponents of the law until Tuesday to respond to Van Hollen's request.
*******************************
Van Hollen just never gives up...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1180 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge won't put voter ID ruling on hold (Original Post)
hue
Aug 2014
OP
Gothmog
(145,129 posts)1. The judge in effect wrote an additional brief on the issues
This was a well written opinion by the judge and addressed the issued raised by Walker and the Wisconsin AG. The 7th Cir. will get to rely on this opinion as an additional brief in this appeal
CatholicEdHead
(9,740 posts)2. He is really trying to drive voting patterns and follow the party line
between this and the gay marriage ban appeal, he seems desperate to keep these going.
Isn't there a rumor that he is Walker's appointed internal party successor if/when Walker runs for President in 2016?
Ellipsis
(9,124 posts)3. Van Hollen's a self serving dick! eom