Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,192 posts)
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 05:34 PM Apr 2015

You go gal! -->#Wisconsin Chief Justice Abrahamson Files Lawsuit Challenging Referendum




You go gal! -->#Wisconsin Chief Justice Abrahamson Files Lawsuit Challenging Referendum http://www.tinyurl.com/p9jsyxs @wisgop #wiright #wipolitics
View summary

The article says it is a Fed lawsuit. Not much more information. I always thought this 'effective immediately' provision was wrong! We elected her a few years ago and she should at least be able to serve out her term as the Chief!


http://wuwm.com/post/chief-justice-abrahamson-files-lawsuit-challenging-referendum
Chief Justice Abrahamson Files Lawsuit Challenging Referendum
By Marti Mikkelson • 7 minutes ago


Wisconsin Supreme Court Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson has filed a federal lawsuit to ensure she's not immediately removed from her leadership position.



............She's named all six members of the court and some state officials as defendants.


Abrahamson is viewed as part of the court's liberal faction, and was expected to be voted out by the conservative majority. She argues in her lawsuit that the change should not be applied until after her current term ends in 2019. If it's applied now, she says it would be a violation of her constitutional right to due process.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You go gal! -->#Wisconsin Chief Justice Abrahamson Files Lawsuit Challenging Referendum (Original Post) riversedge Apr 2015 OP
I'm glad she did this and hope she wins. Scuba Apr 2015 #1
:-) riversedge Apr 2015 #3
Milw Journal article.. riversedge Apr 2015 #2
Long terms of office and seniority give stability to the court. postulater Apr 2015 #4
this law is just an illustration of Scott Walker's demeaning of state workers- riversedge Apr 2015 #7
if republicans cared about referendums Pharaoh Apr 2015 #5
Yeah-this needed to be done Gothmog Apr 2015 #6
So hopeful she is granted an injunction. midnight Apr 2015 #8
Link to her complaint filed with the court dragonlady Apr 2015 #9
ha ha -On p. 15 is "PRAYER FOR RELIEF" riversedge Apr 2015 #10

riversedge

(70,192 posts)
2. Milw Journal article..
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 05:57 PM
Apr 2015

I think I will stay away from the comment section. *maybe


http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/abrahamson-sues-to-keep-her-job-for-four-more-years-b99477837z1-299102921.html

.......Abrahamson, the longest-serving justice in Wisconsin history, filed her lawsuit in federal court in Madison. In it, she contends she should be able to remain chief justice until her term on the court ends in July 2019.

If Abrahamson is demoted, "the term of the current, elected chief justice will be disrupted, her constitutionally protected interest in the office of chief justice will be impaired, the votes of her supporters will be diluted and the results of the 2009 election undone long after-the-fact, while the Wisconsin court system's leadership will become unsettled," her attorney wrote in the federal lawsuit.

In her last race, Abrahamson campaigned as "Wisconsin's chief" and won a new 10-year stint on the court. Her lawsuit said she would not have sought re-election in 2009 if there had been a question about whether she could remain chief justice.

For 126 years, the job of chief justice has gone to the longest serving member of the court. Voters approved a constitutional amendment Tuesday that would change that system to allow the members of the court to select their leader every two years. ................

postulater

(5,075 posts)
4. Long terms of office and seniority give stability to the court.
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:12 PM
Apr 2015

And keeps the direction of the court in the hands of the voters.

Having the judges elect their own turns the court into a partisan clique. Especially with two year terms.

riversedge

(70,192 posts)
7. this law is just an illustration of Scott Walker's demeaning of state workers-
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 10:16 PM
Apr 2015

yes, even the SC Justice Chief is a state worker. Walker is vindictive and pays back folks in mean ways.

dragonlady

(3,577 posts)
9. Link to her complaint filed with the court
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:14 AM
Apr 2015

From reading the complaint it is obvious that this has been in the works for some time, ready for filing if the referendum succeeded. It seems that her attorney on this case is a top-notch constitutional litigator (and the judge is a recent Obama appointee).

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3174287/Abrahamson%20Complaint.pdf

riversedge

(70,192 posts)
10. ha ha -On p. 15 is "PRAYER FOR RELIEF"
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 10:00 AM
Apr 2015

Perhaps I do not read these briefs too often but I do at times. Just have never seen the ending phased as such.



PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court grant the following relief:
a.
A declaration that
the 2015 amendment to
a
rtic
le VII,
s
ection 4(2),
applies

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Wisconsin»You go gal! -->#Wiscon...