Wisconsin
Related: About this forumSen. Hansen Goes Mining For Answers
A little known provision tucked inside the state budget that would repeal a law in place since 1887 that protects Wisconsin land from being controlled by large foreign corporations or governments is leading people to question why the change is being made, who stands to benefit and why is the provision buried deep inside the state budget?
People deserve to know the details behind this mysterious effort to repeal a longstanding law that is in place to preserve the states economic sovereignty, especially during a time when foreign countries like China are becoming increasingly aggressive in their attempts to gain economic advantage over the United States, said Hansen.
Some are questioning whether the provision is somehow tied to a proposed iron ore mine in northern Wisconsin and whether it is designed to clear the way for the mining rights to be sold to a foreign competitor like China.
Throughout the mining debate we heard over and over again that Gogebic Mining, which does coal mining and owns the rights to the mineral deposit in northern Wisconsin, has no interest in actually doing the mining themselves, that they would prefer to sell the rights to someone else, said Hansen.
http://cognidissidence.blogspot.com/2013/03/sen-hansen-goes-mining-for-answers.html
atreides1
(16,075 posts)This falls right into the laps of the voters of Wisconsin...they're now stuck with their choice.
midnight
(26,624 posts)Government Accountability Board director and general council Brian Kennedy has outsourced our computer private source code to the secretary of administration Mike Huebsch who was a former state representative for the Republican party... So he gets to have it programed any which way he wants..... And this is done privately... Kind of like they did when they wrote up the new district maps...
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Wisconsin. I kind of wish he would piss off instead of rubbing salt in the wounds of my hard working Wisconsin brothers who busted ass but came up short of removing Walker.
ewagner
(18,964 posts)is based on a "fair play" paradigm...
some of our brothers and sisters didn't believe that the recall was "fair play" and either didn't vote or voted against it.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)ewagner
(18,964 posts)I think the results of the recall were almost pre-ordained after the 2010 elections...the Tea-billies got into office and dug in deep and couldn't be dislodged.