Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Wisconsin
Related: About this forumWisconsin: There's just too much transparency in government, but Glenn Grothman will fix that.
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/bill-would-greatly-limit-public-access-to-employers-of-campaign-donors-b99112447z1-226308011.htmlBill would greatly limit public access to employers of campaign donors
Madison The public would be kept in the dark about who employs the vast majority of donors to state and local candidates, including all Assembly candidates and City of Milwaukee aldermanic candidates, under a proposal from a Republican lawmaker.
The bill by Sen. Glenn Grothman (R-West Bend) would lift the threshold at which political donors would have to disclose who they work for, a piece of information that often shows their underlying financial interest by revealing ties to an influential union seeking state legislation or a business seeking a city contract.
Under current law, donors must disclose their principal employer if they donate more than $100 in total to candidates in any one year. The proposal would raise that threshold to more than $500 in total contributions.
In one stroke, that would exclude all Assembly contributions and all aldermanic contributions in the state since the maximum donations to those offices are all $500 or less. It also would exclude almost all donations to county board supervisors.
The bill by Sen. Glenn Grothman (R-West Bend) would lift the threshold at which political donors would have to disclose who they work for, a piece of information that often shows their underlying financial interest by revealing ties to an influential union seeking state legislation or a business seeking a city contract.
Under current law, donors must disclose their principal employer if they donate more than $100 in total to candidates in any one year. The proposal would raise that threshold to more than $500 in total contributions.
In one stroke, that would exclude all Assembly contributions and all aldermanic contributions in the state since the maximum donations to those offices are all $500 or less. It also would exclude almost all donations to county board supervisors.
You can always count on Glenn to do the wrong thing!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1543 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wisconsin: There's just too much transparency in government, but Glenn Grothman will fix that. (Original Post)
Scuba
Oct 2013
OP
charmay
(525 posts)1. Grothman is slime.
ewagner
(18,964 posts)2. add to that...
"slime" with a perfectly gerrymandered district ...
mysuzuki2
(3,521 posts)3. I have learned all my positions on political and social issues from Glenn.
Whatever point of view he takes, I take the opposite. Works every time.
postulater
(5,075 posts)4. They're the guys who made a big deal out of publicizing the names of those who signed the Walker
recall petition.
And they want their money donors to be private?
Sorry, no.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)5. Excellent point.
hue
(4,949 posts)6. Yeah, all Re/Teapuke's financing would be secret yet Dems & those opposing RW'ers would be public.