Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Canada
Related: About this forumHarper Moves to Give Up More Canadian Sovereignty
The word ICSID sounds like a sneeze.
It stands for "International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes," which is part of the World Bank. ICSID was created in the 1960s to allow foreign companies to sue countries, especially in the developing world. It is relevant to Canada since the Harper government recently committed Canada to ratify the ICSID Convention.
ICSID and investor-state arbitration
ICSID is a house for investor-state arbitration, the most powerful form of international adjudication in the world.
Investor-state arbitration allows foreign companies to bypass national courts and sue countries directly before special tribunals. The process is one-way; countries cannot bring claims against companies. Lately, investor-state awards against countries have run into billions of dollars.
snip
Concern #1: Removal of any role for courts
Perhaps most importantly, ICSID marks a roll-back of independent judging in the name of globalization. Uniquely, the ICSID Convention allows awards against countries to be enforced without any judicial review. Other houses for investor-state arbitration allow at least for limited review by domestic courts, although typically only in a place chosen by the investor-state arbitrators themselves.
http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2013/11/12/Harper-Gives-Up-Sovereignty/?utm_source=mondayheadlines&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=181113
It stands for "International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes," which is part of the World Bank. ICSID was created in the 1960s to allow foreign companies to sue countries, especially in the developing world. It is relevant to Canada since the Harper government recently committed Canada to ratify the ICSID Convention.
ICSID and investor-state arbitration
ICSID is a house for investor-state arbitration, the most powerful form of international adjudication in the world.
Investor-state arbitration allows foreign companies to bypass national courts and sue countries directly before special tribunals. The process is one-way; countries cannot bring claims against companies. Lately, investor-state awards against countries have run into billions of dollars.
snip
Concern #1: Removal of any role for courts
Perhaps most importantly, ICSID marks a roll-back of independent judging in the name of globalization. Uniquely, the ICSID Convention allows awards against countries to be enforced without any judicial review. Other houses for investor-state arbitration allow at least for limited review by domestic courts, although typically only in a place chosen by the investor-state arbitrators themselves.
http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2013/11/12/Harper-Gives-Up-Sovereignty/?utm_source=mondayheadlines&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=181113
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1835 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Harper Moves to Give Up More Canadian Sovereignty (Original Post)
JohnyCanuck
Nov 2013
OP
SDjack
(1,448 posts)1. So, criminal companies can't be sued. What a novel idea -- not. nt
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)2. ,
,
msongs
(67,361 posts)3. must be taking lessons from Obama and his TPP nt
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)4. Even worse,
Canada was invited late (to the TPP), as 'second tier' participants, meaning that we cannot renegotiate anything thats already been divvyed up, and we have no veto authority over anything else yet to being negotiated. Great deal huh.