Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 05:01 PM Jan 2014

FATCA affects almost 1 million Canadians who have American indica

Last edited Sat Jan 11, 2014, 11:49 PM - Edit history (1)

http://hir.harvard.edu/blog/jessica-dorfmann/the-cost-of-united-states-citizenship-abroad

Home › Blogs › Jessica Dorfmann's blog ›
The Cost of United States Citizenship Abroad

United States in the World Americas
By Jessica Dorfmann | December 3, 2013 | 7:34 PM

Citizenship in the United States affords many benefits - most notably the right to live, work, and vote in a global powerhouse nation. But, in recent years, Americans have been relinquishing their citizenship in record numbers – total annual renunciations have jumped more than ten-fold since 2006. For United States citizens living abroad, the hidden costs of their citizenship are high and the advantages relatively few. The United States is the only country in the world to still practice citizenship-based taxation regardless of residence. And this archaic policy is not only unjustified, but is frustrating and alienating expatriates across the globe.
What does “citizenship-based taxation” mean in practice? Every year, on top of their domestic taxes, United States citizens residing abroad must report virtually all of their foreign financial accounts, income, and assets to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In general, citizens pay the difference between their domestic taxes and what they would have been taxed in the US – so, if a citizen’s domestic taxes are higher than what they would owe in the US, they pay no additional taxes. However, an exemption from additional taxes is not an exemption from the inconvenience, penalties, and hidden costs that come with filing US taxes abroad. The policy is designed in part to discourage wealthy United States citizens from establishing offshore bank accounts or leaving the country in order to avoid paying US taxes. But the vast majority of expatriates are not living abroad to duck taxation – they have simply moved away for work, education, or family reasons and have not returned. Many non-resident citizens have inherited United States citizenship by birth, but have never actually resided there– they’ve received no services from the US government, yet must file American taxes every year or face severe penalties.
This brings us to the first problem with the United States’ taxing of non-residents – there are no philosophical grounds for it. Taxation is typically rationalized for two reasons: either the state is providing the taxpayer with services, or the taxpayer’s revenue is being generated within the borders of the taxing country. The United States government would argue that their policy prevents wealth generated within the United States from being whisked away into tax-free foreign bank accounts, but this argument neglects to acknowledge the masses of expatriates who have earned their income elsewhere, but are still on the hook to the IRS. As mentioned before, there is a large population of foreign-born Americans who have never received anything from the United States government besides an eagle-embossed passport (that they had to fork out about $165 USD for). Why should these men and women be held hostage to the IRS by an accident of birth?



http://hir.harvard.edu/blog/jessica-dorfmann/the-cost-of-united-states-citizenship-abroad

The above is just an excerpt. Click on link to read the rest.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FATCA affects almost 1 million Canadians who have American indica (Original Post) riverbendviewgal Jan 2014 OP
104 views riverbendviewgal Jan 2014 #1
Who Is CHIMO Jan 2014 #2
can't argue with that. laundry_queen Jan 2014 #3
thank you riverbendviewgal Jan 2014 #4
I know right? laundry_queen Jan 2014 #5
don't know riverbendviewgal Jan 2014 #6
, blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #7

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
1. 104 views
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 08:35 PM
Jan 2014

DU is very narrow minded these days....and no empathy.....I been here a long time.

I hated W Bush, cheered for Obama and you guys don't give a shit for anyone else .

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
3. can't argue with that.
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 11:40 PM
Jan 2014

and I've been here a long time too. Things have changed here.

sorry you aren't getting more replies on these threads...it's all very important information.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
4. thank you
Sat Jan 11, 2014, 11:47 PM
Jan 2014

I appreciate your reply. FATCA is the NSA of banking . The US will have access to the whole world's banking and soon it will be happening right in the homeland.
Whatever happened to sovereignty?

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
5. I know right?
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 12:00 AM
Jan 2014

Between the NSA and environmental disasters and Harper and FATCA I totally have outrage fatigue. I wonder what the tipping point will be? Is there one?

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Canada»FATCA affects almost 1 mi...