Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This one isn't so bad: Get rid of the Royal Perogative (Original Post) Jeneral2885 Aug 2015 OP
Prerogative PSPS Sep 2015 #1
Forgive my 'Murriken ign'rance. Rod Beauvex Sep 2015 #2
Not much. LeftishBrit Sep 2015 #4
The 'Royal Prerogative' is controlled by the Prime Minister, not the monarch muriel_volestrangler Sep 2015 #5
Thanks for posting this info! LeftishBrit Sep 2015 #6
I suspect that Corbyn probably couldn't care less about being called 'Right Honourable' or being in LeftishBrit Sep 2015 #3
Does all those titles go also? packman Sep 2015 #7

muriel_volestrangler

(101,294 posts)
5. The 'Royal Prerogative' is controlled by the Prime Minister, not the monarch
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:42 AM
Sep 2015

jen and the Torygraph are muddying the waters by pretending this is about the Queen. Here's what he actually said, indicating he knows what the powers are:

All agreed it was time to replace the House of Lords with an elected chamber, but Corbyn also revealed he would like to go further than that by weakening some of the Queen’s powers. “The royal prerogative should be subject to parliamentary vote and veto if necessary,” he said. “The Queen hands her powers to the prime minister and he can then exercise them. It’s a very convenient way of bypassing parliament. Also, orders in council are a very convenient way of bypassing parliament.”

One of the royal prerogative powers derived from the crown, rather than parliament, is the prime minister’s ability to commit troops in armed conflict.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/27/jeremy-corbyn-labour-membership-policy-leadership

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
6. Thanks for posting this info!
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 09:12 AM
Sep 2015

It seems to be more about making it harder for the PM to send people to war without parliamentary approval, than anything to do with the Queen.

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
3. I suspect that Corbyn probably couldn't care less about being called 'Right Honourable' or being in
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 07:15 AM
Sep 2015

the Privy Council.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
7. Does all those titles go also?
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 10:55 AM
Sep 2015

Royal Chamberlord of the Privy
The Lord and Ladies Holder of the Garter
The Right Honorable Keeper of the Keys
Sir Baron of Brains

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»This one isn't so bad: Ge...