Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

oldironside

(1,248 posts)
Tue May 15, 2012, 06:54 AM May 2012

Rebekah Brooks to be charged with perverting the course of justice

Rebekah Brooks, the former chief executive of News International, is to be charged over allegations that she tried to conceal evidence from detectives investigating phone hacking and alleged bribes to public officials.

Brooks, one of the most high-profile figures in the newspaper industry, will be charged later on Tuesday with three counts of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice in July last year at the height of the police investigation, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced.

She is accused of conspiring with others, including her husband, Charlie Brooks, the racehorse trainer and friend of the prime minister, and her personal assistant, to conceal material from detectives.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/may/15/rebekah-brooks-charged-perverting-course-justice

I'll let Beaker sum up how I feel about this one.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rebekah Brooks to be charged with perverting the course of justice (Original Post) oldironside May 2012 OP
Good news... LeftishBrit May 2012 #1
Judging by her reaction... oldironside May 2012 #2
I can't help but be reminded of Jonathan Aitken and Jeffrey Archer muriel_volestrangler May 2012 #3
Aitken, Archer, Brooks. oldironside May 2012 #5
"They don't like it up 'em, sah!" non sociopath skin May 2012 #4
The Murdoch Empire is very like the Mafia, with one important exception LeftishBrit May 2012 #6
You gotta feel sympathy for her (not) SwissTony May 2012 #7

oldironside

(1,248 posts)
2. Judging by her reaction...
Tue May 15, 2012, 02:54 PM
May 2012

... she's not taking it too well. Hell hath no fury like a redhead tabloid vampire threatened with prison.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
3. I can't help but be reminded of Jonathan Aitken and Jeffrey Archer
Tue May 15, 2012, 08:13 PM
May 2012

and their furious protestations of innocence. They both involved their spouses in the lies as well.

oldironside

(1,248 posts)
5. Aitken, Archer, Brooks.
Wed May 16, 2012, 07:38 AM
May 2012

Is the justice system prosecuting lying right wing bastards alphabetically? They've done the 'A's, they have finally reached the 'B's. I have to say I'm looking forward to them reaching the 'T's.

non sociopath skin

(4,972 posts)
4. "They don't like it up 'em, sah!"
Wed May 16, 2012, 07:27 AM
May 2012
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/may/15/rebekah-brooks-defiant-phone-hacking

Whatever happened to "It's a fair cop, Officer - you got me bang to rights, there"?

They don't make villains like they used to.

The Skin

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
6. The Murdoch Empire is very like the Mafia, with one important exception
Wed May 16, 2012, 08:16 AM
May 2012

Rebekah and her cronies are NOT likely to follow the code of 'Omerta'.

I hope for a lot of canary-like singing before all this is finished.

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
7. You gotta feel sympathy for her (not)
Wed May 16, 2012, 10:23 AM
May 2012

Rebekah Brooks has hit out at the decision to charge her with three counts of conspiracy to obstruct the course of justice, describing the case against her as "an expensive sideshow" and a "waste of public money".

Looking tired and nervous, the former News International chief executive chose to speak after her husband, Charlie, making a set of brief remarks in which she attacked the Crown Prosection Service's decision to bring charges on Tuesday morning.

Speaking live to camera outside the central London offices of her lawyers, Kingsley Napley, shortly before 5.30pm on Tuesday, Brooks said: "Whilst I have always respected the criminal justice system, I have to question today whether the decision was made on a proper impartial assessment of the evidence.

"I understand and know that there needs to be a proper and thorough investigation, and I am baffled by the decision to charge me. More importantly, however, I cannot express my anger enough that those closest to me have been dragged into this unfairly.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"proper impartial assessment of the evidence"??? Give me a break. When did MotW ever apply this standard?

"those closest to me have been dragged into this unfairly" White courtesy phone for Rebekah Brooks - Miss Church's family on the line.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/may/15/rebekah-brooks-charges

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Rebekah Brooks to be char...