Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Windows OS from 1990-2015 (Original Post) Renew Deal Jan 2016 OP
I LOVE the parenthetical remarks! CaliforniaPeggy Jan 2016 #1
Out of all those: hobbit709 Jan 2016 #2
Win 3.1 worked well Mnpaul Jan 2016 #5
Naw, the progression was... yowzayowzayowza Jan 2016 #7
Loved the oh-so-dry comment on ME... n/t TygrBright Jan 2016 #3
I guess I'm the only one that didn't hate ME. gvstn Jan 2016 #4
I notice the RAM/HD footprint info disappeared about 2000 ... nt eppur_se_muova Jan 2016 #6
I have 3.1 and 3.11 around here somewhere. lpbk2713 Jan 2016 #8
I installed Windows 2 on a PC to use with an FTIR spectrophotometer back in the day Thor_MN Jan 2016 #9
My first Windows was 3.1, my last 98SE hunter Jan 2016 #10

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
2. Out of all those:
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 05:29 PM
Jan 2016

3.1 worked well for it's time
95 worked well after OSR2 came out
98 worked fairly well
ME should never have been released
2000 worked great
XP worked fine after a few teething issues
Vista also should never have been released
7 works well
8/8.1 "Vista with a cellphone interface"
10- M$ wants to take over your computer

Notice they completely skipped 9.

If they run true to form, 11 will probably work.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
5. Win 3.1 worked well
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 09:04 PM
Jan 2016

but it was made a whole lot better if you had Norton software installed. I miss Norton Desktop. I wish they were still in the business of improving Windows.

I still use a modern clone of Norton Commander in Windows(Pablo Commander).

yowzayowzayowza

(7,017 posts)
7. Naw, the progression was...
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:02 AM
Jan 2016

NT 3.1, 3.51, 4.0 then Win2k .... 3.1, 95, 98, ME were a bunch of thunkin posers. Long live Dave Cutler.

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
4. I guess I'm the only one that didn't hate ME.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 08:22 PM
Jan 2016

It wasn't worth the $49.99 upgrade price from win98 but didn't seem that bad. It worked fine and gave System Restore. I got a free plastic watch in the process but stole Win XP because the upgrade price was too high for the value.

lpbk2713

(42,753 posts)
8. I have 3.1 and 3.11 around here somewhere.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:20 PM
Jan 2016



Also have Win 98, about 25 discs IIRC. All on floppies. I haven't had a PC with a
floppy drive for over ten years or more. Just can't bring myself to throw them out.


 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
9. I installed Windows 2 on a PC to use with an FTIR spectrophotometer back in the day
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:05 AM
Jan 2016

First Windows software that I ever used. IIRC, the PC was a 286.

hunter

(38,310 posts)
10. My first Windows was 3.1, my last 98SE
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 10:44 PM
Jan 2016

Before usable MS Windows I was an Atari guy, but I also had IBM & clones running DRDOS and Geoworks.

Before and during Atari days, I used BSD mostly on university computers. BSD was the first "real" operating system I used. (MSDOS doesn't count nor does MS Windows until NT was released.

Switching to Debian from Windows 98SE was like returning home.

I just finished building a new Debian laptop today from a busted and obsolete Windows 7 machine.

It's now my fastest machine, runs like the wind.

The machine was getting to be pretty useless as a Windows machine, which is why it was discarded. Windows 10 would probably choke it. My entire Debian install with all the tools I commonly use, Gimp, Libre Office, etc., is a little over 4 GB.

As a stupid person, I like to keep it simple. The KISS principle.





Latest Discussions»Help & Search»Computer Help and Support»Windows OS from 1990-2015