Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kennah

(14,234 posts)
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 12:05 AM Feb 2012

NASA unplugs last mainframe

http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/nasa-unplugs-last-mainframe

It's somewhat hard to imagine that NASA doesn't need the computing power of an IBM mainframe any more but NASA CIO posted on her blog today at the end of the month, the Big Iron will be no more at the space agency.

NASA CIO Linda Cureton wrote: This month marks the end of an era in NASA computing. Marshall Space Flight Center powered down NASA's last mainframe, the IBM Z9 Mainframe. For my millennial readers, I suppose that I should define what a mainframe is. Well, that's easier said than done, but here goes -- It's a big computer that is known for being reliable, highly available, secure, and powerful. They are best suited for applications that are more transaction oriented and require a lot of input/output - that is, writing or reading from data storage devices.
...
But all things must change. Today, they are the size of a refrigerator but in the old days, they were the size of a Cape Cod. Even though NASA has shut down its last one, there is still a requirement for mainframe capability in many other organizations.

Of course NASA is just one of the latest high profile mainframe decommissionings. In 2009 The U.S. House of Representatives took its last mainframe offline. At the time Network World wrote: "The last mainframe supposedly enjoyed "quasi-celebrity status" within the House data center, having spent 12 years keeping the House's inventory control records and financial management data, among other tasks. But it was time for a change, with the House spending $30,000 a year to power the mainframe and another $700,000 each year for maintenance and support."

*****************************************************

As mainframes fade from clients who no longer need them, and it's hard to imagine NASA having "small computing needs", mainframes will continue to disappear.

However, I suspect COBOL will probably beat the mainframe to the grave.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NASA unplugs last mainframe (Original Post) Kennah Feb 2012 OP
Saw this at the Computer Museum in Boston SeattleVet Feb 2012 #1
Haha RIP Cobol chrisa Feb 2012 #2
Spam deleted by hlthe2b (MIR Team) sbglobal2013 Sep 2012 #3
Back in the early 2000s AgingAmerican Oct 2012 #4
 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
4. Back in the early 2000s
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 12:15 PM
Oct 2012

There was a place near Seattle called 'Boeing Surplus' that was the official retail outlet of the Boeing corporation for their old surplus computers, tools, equipment, etc.

One day I was in there and they had some of their old mainframe computers from the 70s in there. Huge things they were, and they were selling them for $150 each. I almost bought one, just because I know they originally paid millions for them, but my wife would have killed me had I brought something like that home. The geek in me still regrets not getting one, on some level.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Website, DB, & Software Developers»NASA unplugs last mainfra...