Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Weird News

shenmue

(38,506 posts) Mon May 25, 2015, 12:26 PM May 2015

Northern Ireland: even vacuum cleaners can get married

In Northern Ireland, a shop owner showed support for the victory of marriage equality in the neighboring Republic of Ireland. He let two portable vacuum cleaners get married too.

Story here

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Northern Ireland: even vacuum cleaners can get married (Original Post) shenmue May 2015 OP

if I marry my two worn down vacuums, do you think they would produce a new young working one for me? hollysmom May 2015 #1

We can hope shenmue May 2015 #2

I thought the pic might be kinda offensive (making fun of the vote), but it's actually very cute! nt valerief May 2015 #3

US GOP Presidental candidates now claiming inanimate objects can get married in... 47of74 May 2015 #4

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)

1. if I marry my two worn down vacuums, do you think they would produce a new young working one for me?

Reply to shenmue (Original post)

Mon May 25, 2015, 12:37 PM

May 2015

shenmue

(38,506 posts)

2. We can hope

Reply to hollysmom (Reply #1)

Tue May 26, 2015, 03:52 AM

May 2015

valerief

(53,235 posts)

3. I thought the pic might be kinda offensive (making fun of the vote), but it's actually very cute! nt

Reply to shenmue (Original post)

Tue May 26, 2015, 09:34 AM

May 2015

47of74

(18,470 posts)

4. US GOP Presidental candidates now claiming inanimate objects can get married in...

Reply to shenmue (Original post)

Tue May 26, 2015, 07:51 PM

May 2015

...5....4....3....2....1!

You know "Senator Man on Dog" Santorum will be saying that next.

Reply to this discussion