Some numbers from LA Times poll released today (May 19 - 31)

[kstewart33]

...among those most likely to vote, based on their voting history and stated intentions this time around, Clinton led, 49%-39%, in the new poll. Her standing is bolstered by the reliability of her older supporters, who have a proven record of casting ballots.

She also leads convincingly among registered Democrats; 53% of likely Democratic voters supported her, to 37% for Sanders. Throughout the year, she has carried party members in every state but Sanders’ home state of Vermont and next-door New Hampshire, where he won in a landslide.

As he has elsewhere, Sanders benefits here from party rules that allow registered nonpartisan voters — known in California as “no party preference” voters — to take part in the Democratic primary. Among nonpartisans who were likely to vote, Sanders led by 48%-35%.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-latimes-presidential-primary-poll-20160602-snap-story.html

[SaschaHM]

1. Boom!

Live feed from the Sanders for President HQ. That CA and Super Delegate landslide is not happening.

[BobbyDrake]

4. June 16th at Camp Projection:

[msongs]

2. and those least likely to vote: millenials, young people, independents

[kstewart33]

5. No, I don't think so.

According to the LA Times, the most reliable voters are older Democrats.

[beachbum bob]

3. the poll number of all voters....which gives sanders an edge is the worse metric of polling

of course sanders followers latch on that as their only glimmer of hope...5 more days this over on so many levels