Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:43 AM Jun 2016

Parents of Sandy Hook victim: Sanders is wrong about the point of our lawsuit

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/parents-sandy-hook-victim-sanders-wrong-about-the-point-our-lawsuit

Mark and Jackie Barden, whose 7-year-old son Daniel was murdered in the Sandy Hook massacre in December 2012, have voiced their opposition to comments Sen. Bernie Sanders made during a Democratic presidential debate on March 6 that gun manufacturers should not be liable if a crime is committed with their product.

In a Washington Post op-ed published online on Friday, the Bardens argued that the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle, which was used to kill their son, 19 other children and six adults in the elementary school shooting, is a highly lethal military weapon that should not be sold to the public. The parents, along with nine other families, filed a lawsuit in December 2014 against Remington Arms, which manufactured the weapon Adam Lanza used to carry out the attack in Newtown, Connecticut.

“If you go to a store and you legally purchase a gun, and three days later you go out and start killing people, is the point to hold the gun shop owner or the manufacturer of that gun liable? If that’s the point, I disagree,” Sanders said. “If they are selling a product to a person who buys it legally, what you’re talking about is ending gun manufacturing in America.”

In the op-ed, the Bardens said the Vermont senator “has spent decades tirelessly advocating for greater corporate responsibility, which is why we cannot fathom his support of companies that recklessly market and profit from the sale of combat weapons to civilians and then shrug their shoulders when the next tragedy occurs, leaving ordinary families and communities to pick up the pieces.”


NRA calls Bernie Sanders’ comments on gunmaker liability ‘spot on’

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/nra-calls-bernie-sanders-comments-gunmaker-liability-spot?artlink=1

The National Rifle Association posted a tweet in support of a comment the Vermont senator made on gun industry immunity during a heated exchange in Sunday night’s Democratic debate with his rival, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“Sen. Sanders was spot-on in his comments about gun manufacturer liability/PLCAA,” the gun lobby tweeted. The post was accompanied by a graphic of the senator’s remarks: “What you’re talking about is ending gun manufacturing in America. I don’t agree with that.”

During the debate, which was televised live from Flint, Michigan, host Anderson Cooper asked Sanders and Clinton if they support a lawsuit filed by families of the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting victims. The suit is against Remington Arms Company, which manufactured the weapon the gunman used. Cooper said it might not go anywhere because of a law Sanders backed in 2005 that shields gun manufacturers from certain lawsuits when someone legally buys a gun and then intentionally misuses it.

Ian Sams, a spokesman for the Clinton campaign, tweeted, “While the NRA defends @BernieSanders, it attacks @HillaryClinton. What more do we need to know?”


13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. A weapon of war should only be available to military and LEO'S.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:50 AM
Jun 2016

The idea one industry gets immunity from lawsuits is wrong. It is not a fair playing field for all other industries. It was a bad vote.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
3. His craven, self-serving stance has been called out.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 10:45 AM
Jun 2016

Hope the LGBTQ community goes after him to the point of primarying him in 2018.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
5. No one deserves to be primaried out more than The Berned Out One. He's outstayed his welcome
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 10:53 AM
Jun 2016

in more ways than one...

If Giordano doesn't, then someone else has to step up. Time to go, Bern.

Cha!

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
8. Is there someone we can donate to...
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 11:19 AM
Jun 2016

I'd love to see someone take Bernie's seat away from him!

Cha

(297,164 posts)
9. It's two years away so whenever I hear of something I'll let you know.. Al Giordano
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 11:28 AM
Jun 2016

was one of my favorite bloggers and now he's one of my favorite Tweeters.

Sancho

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
6. I think Sanders has done a good job of letting us know exactly where he stands on gun control.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 11:14 AM
Jun 2016

His record is miserable. His vote against the families of murdered children and his glaring absence from this weeks filibuster makes me glad he isn't a member of my party.

Only someone with a big problem with gun control would ballyhoo a one year score of D minus from the NRA in 25 years in the legislature.

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
7. The gun manufacture immunity is just one of Bernie's love of guns...
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 11:18 AM
Jun 2016

he has NOT been in favor of waiting periods. He has NOT been in favor of restrictions to carry guns across state lines. He has NOT called for a license to possess guns and ammunition.

Bernie is an NRA dream...talks a lots and passes no meaningful legislation. Bernie knows what he is doing and so does the NRA.

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
10. These 2 paragraphs some it up.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 12:54 PM
Jun 2016
“If you go to a store and you legally purchase a gun, and three days later you go out and start killing people, is the point to hold the gun shop owner or the manufacturer of that gun liable? If that’s the point, I disagree,” Sanders said. “If they are selling a product to a person who buys it legally, what you’re talking about is ending gun manufacturing in America.”

In the op-ed, the Bardens said the Vermont senator “has spent decades tirelessly advocating for greater corporate responsibility, which is why we cannot fathom his support of companies that recklessly market and profit from the sale of combat weapons to civilians and then shrug their shoulders when the next tragedy occurs, leaving ordinary families and communities to pick up the pieces.”

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
12. Accordong to Sanders, corporations are evil..exept those having to do with manufacturing and selling
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jun 2016

guns...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Parents of Sandy Hook vic...