I think full context is quite important. As part of the Iranian deal to lift the sanctions

[still_one]

Iran is required to refrain from work on ballistic missiles designed to deliver nuclear weapons for up to eight years as part of that agreement.

It is a valid argument for discussion whether sanctions should reconsidered if Iran violates terms of that agreement.

In fact it is a question to ask all the candidates, what should be done if Iran violates the terms of the deal?

While reintroducing sanctions should NOT be rushed into, neither should violations of the agreement be glossed over.

[still_one]

1. As a follow-up it looks the administration is imposing some sanctions on

Iranian companies and individuals over the missile program, because it is a violation of the Iran nuclear agreement


It's a breaking news story, so there are not much details, however, it only puts emphasis on my OP, that it is a valid question what should be done if Iran violates the agreement?

[William769]

2. I agree completely.

[OKNancy]

3. It's just detractors outrage of the day.

Eventually and hopefully the outrage will be directed at the true enemy... the Republicans.

[dlwickham]

4. Hillary is exactly right

keep the sanctions on until the Iranians live up to their end of the agreement