Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumPolitico admits media is 'primed to take down Hillary Clinton'-HRC Room
HILLARY CLINTON ROOM POST
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/05/08/1383349/-Politico-admits-media-is-primed-to-take-down-Hillary-Clinton
Article is small.
This is the Politico article;
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/05/the-medias-real-role-in-206766.html#.VUu8IJeh7AJ.twitter
Here is the most interesting part of the article.
This argument overlooks two important factors: First, the national media have never been more primed to take down Hillary Clinton (and, by the same token, elevate a Republican candidate). Even before she announced her presidential bid, The New York Times alone had published more than 40 articles related to her private email account, spurring other stories across the national print, digital and television media. Since announcing her bid, the national media have spent the bulk of their time investigating potential lines of influence between Clinton Foundation donations/speaking fees and Clinton's actions as secretary of state. The Times, The Washington Post and others even struck deals for early access to anti-Clinton research.
I think this shows that the media is against her and will even lie to take her down.
with the help of some on the DU.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Some here are still cheering the Clinton cash book.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)From Politico link:
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Plain and simple.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)politicians and billionaires all openly bribing and being bribed and bought and paid for for favors, from sea to shining sea, all awaiting another explosion of campaign cash that washes away all hypocrisy.
That media?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)It is so hypocritical.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Is it they just think she is too big for her britches, or that her husband got away with something, or just a tendency in the media to build people up because they delight in taking them down?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)And the reporter owners want s gop president for the supreme court.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)for the poor but also raising ideas and the level of debate....is making the self serving, self insulated ink stained wretches that pass for journalists and TV anchors and pundits jealous.
And for making the American media look really, really bad in comparison for being the billionaire-class prostitutes that they have willingly become.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)and all of the accusers are packing water guns, guess what, the water just rolls off. I think some are getting angry because they continue to roll on and not get all upset.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)with the name "Bush" on it?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)But "progressive" people on the left as well.
The right wing is hopin and praying that a combo of lies, innuendo and progressive/left idiocy knocks Hillary out of the race and replaces her with an unknown, socialist leftist who even a bark at the moon knuckle dragger like Cruz or Walker can easily beat!
The MSM/hate radio would destroy Sanders in a heartbeat! Of course it helps greatly that no one outside of progressive internet political boards even knows who he is!
It will be a cakewalk for the republicans if Hillary is not our candidate in 2016.
Friends we have to do everything we can to support Hillary and get her into the White House!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)The other candidates are nice but they are not going to win.
And yes some members here buy into rw lies about Hillary.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I'm looking forward to....2016
Monday, February 1: Iowa caucus
Tuesday, February 9: New Hampshire
Saturday, February 20: South Carolina
Tuesday, February 23: Nevada caucus
I hope Hillary has ground ops going already in these places. She needs to dominate any other candidate in these first contests.
Between now and then it will be a full on assault against her from the right and left and neither one of these groups care if its the truth or lies they are spewing.
After all the Clinton Cash teahaddist lie book was quoted for weeks right here on "progressive/left" DU as the gospel truth!
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)YES 2 GROUPS. I have had enough of the RW lies. They don't want debate. What they do want is to keep an useless argument going so their useless OP remains at the top of the page.
After deleting the 2 Groups, my DU page shows the latest news & omits the post after post of same thing different day opinion hit pieces that crowd out my DU page of far worthy information about the world.
Now, DU is the same one I have always come here for.
Remove the useless chatter. Its a pretty great place again.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Of course I have my subscriptions listed in the left column.
Settings on the latest page:
[url=http://www.servimg.com/view/11715825/1491][img][/img][/url]
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)..workingclasszero you are a credit to the purpose of the Hillary Clinton Group.
There is no other way to say the truth, than how you just said it.
Bravo
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Campaign. We all worked tirelessly & became campaign family during that battle.
We swore we'd never go through that again, but here we are all Ready for Hillary. Ha!
We're off to a slow start but I'll post any new news as the year goes on.
But yes, 2016 is serious stuff & now we will be part of the election of Hillary Clinton..how could we not!
We will all work to get our girl elected.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,222 posts)Jim Malone
May 08, 2015 12:04 PM
Clintons support among Democrats appears resilient, according to John Fortier, an analyst at the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington.
What she does run on is having great experience, great support from the party, great support from all of the leaders, all of the fundraisers and that is a very strong position to begin from, he said.
http://www.voanews.com/content/clinton-appears-holdin-gsteady-in-presidential-polls-/2759949.html
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)When Hillary announced in 2007 that she was running, my 16 year old (at the time) son ran home from school and excitedly told me, "Mom, we are finally going to have a woman president." While I was proud that concept excited him the first thing that ran through my mind was actually "Oh hell, the MEDIA is not going to allow this country to have a female president."
The media is run by men. Who are very threatened by the idea of a female president. Assholes.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Cha
(296,875 posts)President
They don't give a shite if our country is destroyed as long as they have tax cuts. They pumped the bush war on Iraq, didn't they.. corporatemediawhores inc. Only gotten worse since I banned them from my brain in Nov 2002.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Heartbreaking that they want a supreme court full of rwers and they are willing to do anything to elect a Republican to get it.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)The thing is that they will obviously have to double time it to tear Clinton down, so it's going to get ugly. Just prepare for it. They need a horse race otherwise their ratings go down the tube. If Clinton has a double digit lead into the elections then there's nothing to discuss. They need it to be down to at least 5 points for viewers to keep tuning in.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)First out of the starting gate with commanding odds from well before the election--the get out front , run like hell and never look back. It worked for Secretariat, and it will work for Hillary if we do our local groundwork well.