Why Sam Wang is not covering D primaries anymore

[robbedvoter]

I've been looking forward to his forecasts as his reputation is even more sterling than Nate Silvers. But he's been doing 🐘 only. Yesterday, in a foot note, I finally discovered why http://election.princeton.edu/2016/03/05/more-of-the-same/
[link:http://election.princeton.edu/2016/03/05/more-of-the-same/|

* I’m not going to write about Democrats. If we use the majority of pledged delegates as a criterion, the paint became dry as of South Carolina/Nevada. If one includes superdelegates in the count, Hillary Clinton started above the 50% criterion even before Iowa/New Hampshire and has not dipped below.

[SunSeeker]

1. Sam Wang relies on reality.

[Iliyah]

2. Yep . . . and K & R this

[livetohike]

3. K&R

[yallerdawg]

4. Primaries end March 15 for DailyKos.

Other major liberal Democratic websites are taking note - aren't they?

[spooky3]

5. And by March 15, primaries will include large purple states

With a demographic mix that is typical of the country as a whole--not heavily non-Latino white, heavily AA, nor heavily Latino. If she wins these as expected, no one can reasonably dismiss what these votes mean.

[spooky3]

6. He has been spot on in the past.

Thanks for the post.

[dlwickham]

7. Oligarch!!!!!!!

[Historic NY]

8. +1 sometimes the light is dazzeling.

[Cha]

9. Oh!

Bummer! I like him, too.