Go for it Hillary!!!

[Yavin4]

Make history twice! Win over the Bernie voters! Bring the party together! Set a new course for America! This is your VP!

[shenmue]

1. This isn't the Sanders or Warren group

Sanders voters despise Clinton. That was their whole point.

Don't use the VP as a substitute for the Warren presidency the Hillary haters wanted before.

[Yavin4]

2. In politics, you have to let things go.

Kennedy and Johnson hated each other, but they came together to win in 1960. Obama and Clinton ran tough campaigns against each other in 2008, but they came together.

Brining Warren onto the ticket heals wounds and makes for a powerhouse ticket.

[tinyhowls]

7. Not the same thing

This doesn't boil down to policy differences or approach (like Kennedy v Johnson), this is about ending blatant corruption in our government. This is about supporting a candidate with integrity over one who puts their personal interests and the interests of corporate America over the American people.

[Lucinda]

3. Not likely though is it?

Two women from the same region of the country doesn't do much for diversity. And I'd much rather see Warren in the Senate kicking bum.

[riversedge]

4. Yes, she needs someone out of New England .

[Her Sister]

5. Heard pundits asking if Trump would consider Rubio

as vice-president. No answer, but that could be.

[Rose Siding]

6. There are demographic and geographic considerations involved in VP picks

-all to enhance the chances of winning the general. While ideologies might be relevant, I'm not convinced there really are broad ideological differences between those two. Both are liberal and pragmatic.

With Hillary being from NY, and after her win in MA, someone from another part of the country would be a better vote getter.

Likewise, a minority pick and even gender diversity might open up a broader pool of votes.