Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,501 posts)
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 07:05 PM Oct 2014

We Called It Genocide in Guatemala. Why Not in Gaza Too?

We Called It Genocide in Guatemala. Why Not in Gaza Too?

Even some critics of Israel bristled when its recent attacks on Gaza were called "genocidal." But a closer look reveals disturbing parallels with genocides past.

By Patricia Davis, October 7, 2014.

In Israel’s recent assault on Gaza, 70 percent of those killed were civilians.

Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas has accused Israel of genocide. And he has company. The National Lawyers Guild, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the American Jurists Association, and other legal organizations have asked an International Criminal Court prosecutor to investigate Israel for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. A lawsuit filed in federal court in Buenos Aires also accuses Israel of genocide.

The accusation has outraged many. As historian Deborah Lipstadt puts it, “People might totally disagree with all aspects of Israeli policy towards the Palestinians—including those in Gaza—but to call this a genocide is to distort both what was done to Jews during World War II and what is being done to Palestinians today.” According to Lipstadt, “Calling what was done in Gaza a genocide is to use the Holocaust memory, symbolism, and imagery for political purposes.”

Michael Lerner, editor of Tikkun magazine, is no proponent of the “g” word either. “What Israel is doing is bad enough,” he wrote, “without trying to fit it into a category which brings up memories of real genocides—the attempt of the Nazis to wipe out every Jew and every gay person and every gypsy, the attempt of American settlers to wipe out every Native American, etc.” But genocide does not require an attempt to eliminate an entire people. It requires an intent to destroy a population “in whole or in part.” And mass annihilations of the kind Lerner mentions are not the only genocides on record.

A more relevant comparison is the Guatemalan army’s genocide of Mayan indigenous people. For decades, Guatemala was engaged in a long, asymmetric war against a small guerrilla army that, like Hamas, never presented a serious threat to the ultimate power structure and emerged in response to inequality and dispossession. Last year a court in Guatemala ruled that former Guatemalan general Efraín Ríos Montt was responsible for genocide when the army he commanded killed 1,771 Ixil Mayans, wiping out 5.5 percent of the Ixil Maya population in 17 months.

More:
http://fpif.org/called-genocide-guatemala-gaza/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=called-genocide-guatemala-gaza

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We Called It Genocide in Guatemala. Why Not in Gaza Too? (Original Post) Judi Lynn Oct 2014 OP
Reminder of the result of the "guilty" finding on Efrain Rios-Montt's genocide charge: Judi Lynn Oct 2014 #1

Judi Lynn

(160,501 posts)
1. Reminder of the result of the "guilty" finding on Efrain Rios-Montt's genocide charge:
Tue Oct 7, 2014, 07:09 PM
Oct 2014

In Guatemala, A Mass Grave for the Truth

In a week of remarkable events and reversals in Guatemala, the genocide trial of former dictator Efrain Rios Montt came to an abrupt halt on April 18.

By Patricia Davis, April 23, 2013.

In a week of remarkable events and reversals in Guatemala, the genocide trial of former dictator Efraín Ríos Montt came to an abrupt halt on April 18 as a judge ruled all proceedings to date invalid. The witnesses who testified for the prosecution—dozens of survivors of mass rape and massacres—would have to testify again if the trial were to proceed.

“The ruling constitutes a mockery of justice and of the victims,” tweeted Claudia Samayoa, head of the Unity for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders. Addressing Otto Pérez Molina, Guatemala’s current president who had himself been an Army major in the region of the massacres under Ríos Montt’s rule, she continued: “Mr. President, respect once and for all the courts and accept that, yes, there was genocide and you were a part of it.”

Public Prosecutor Claudia Paz y Paz has appealed the ruling to Guatemala’s Constitutional Court, which must decide whether it was legal.

Protesters are calling for the resumption of the trial. They take these actions in a dangerous climate: death squads are again operating in Guatemala, eliminating indigenous leaders, union leaders, women’s rights activists, and others challenging the status quo and asserting their rights. In the last eight weeks, six indigenous community leaders have been killed. Five others were abducted and held for a time. Three of those abducted were tortured.

More:
http://fpif.org/in_guatemala_a_mass_grave_for_the_truth/

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»We Called It Genocide in ...