Latin America
Related: About this forumThe Latin America WikiLeaks Files
The Latin America WikiLeaks Files
US diplomatic cables reveal a coordinated assault against Latin Americas left-wing governments.
by Alexander Main & Dan Beeton
Earlier this summer, the world watched Greece try to resist a disastrous neoliberal diktat and get a painful thrashing in the process. When Greeces left government decided to hold a national referendum on the troika-imposed austerity program, the European Central Bank retaliated by restricting liquidity for Greek banks. This triggered a prolonged bank closure and plunged Greece further into recession. Though Greek voters ended up massively rejecting austerity, Germany and the European creditor cartel were able to subvert democracy and get exactly what they wanted: complete submission to their neoliberal agenda.
In the last decade and a half, a similar fight against neoliberalism has been waged across the breadth of an entire continent, and mostly outside of the public eye. Although Washington initially sought to quash all dissent, often employing even fiercer tactics than those used against Greece, Latin Americas resistance to the neoliberal agenda has in large part been successful. Its an epic tale thats gradually coming to light thanks to continued exploration of the massive trove of US diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks.
Neoliberalism was firmly implanted in Latin America long before Germany and the eurozone authorities began force-feeding structural adjustment to Greece and other indebted, peripheral countries. Through coercion (e.g., conditions attached to IMF loans) and indoctrination (e.g., the US-backed training of the regions Chicago Boys), the US succeeded in spreading the gospel of fiscal austerity, deregulation, free trade, privatization, and draconian public sector downsizing throughout Latin America by the mid-1980s.
The outcome was strikingly similar to what weve seen in Greece: stagnant growth (almost no per capita income growth for the twenty years from 1980-2000), rising poverty, declining living standards for millions, and plenty of new opportunities for international investors and corporations to make a quick buck.
Starting in the late 80s, the region began to convulse and rise up against neoliberal policies. At first, the rebellion was mostly spontaneous and unorganized as was the case with Venezuelas Caracazo uprising in early 1989. But then, anti-neoliberal political candidates began to win elections and, to the shock of the US foreign policy establishment, an increasing number of them stuck to their campaign promises and began implementing anti-poverty measures and heterodox policies that reasserted the states role in the economy.
More:
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/09/latin-america-wikileaks-hugo-chavez-rafael-correa-obama-venezuela-intervention/
Judi Lynn
(160,450 posts)A USAID report from 2007 stated that its Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) ha[d] approved 101 grants for $4,066,131 to help departmental governments operate more strategically. Funds also went to local indigenous groups that were opposed to Evo Morales vision for indigenous communities.
A year later, the Media Luna departments would engage in open rebellion against the Morales government, first holding referenda on autonomy, despite these having been ruled illegal by the national judiciary; then supporting violent pro-autonomy protests that left at least twenty government supporters dead.
Many believed an attempted coup was unfolding. The situation only calmed under pressure from all the other presidents of South America, who issued a joint declaration of support for the countrys constitutional government.
But as South America rallied behind Evo, the United States was in regular communication with the leaders of the separatist opposition movement, even as they spoke openly of blow[ing] up gas lines and violence as a probability to force the government to . . . take seriously any dialogue.
Contrary to its official posture during the events of August and September 2008, the State Department took the possibility of a coup detat against, or the assassination of, Bolivian President Evo Morales seriously.
A cable reveals plans by the US embassy in La Paz to prepare for such an event: [The Emergency Action Committee] will develop, with [the US Southern Command Situational Assessment Team], a plan for immediate response in the event of a sudden emergency, i.e. a coup attempt or President Morales death, the cable read.
The events of 2008 were the greatest challenge yet to Moraless presidency, and the closest he came to being toppled. The embassys preparations for Moraless possible departure from the presidency reveal that the United States, at least, believed the threat to Morales to be very real. That it did not say so publicly only underscores which side Washington was taking during the conflict, and which outcome it probably preferred.
Real Democrats followed these events very carefully, and thoughtfully, at the time. This is no small matter, and just a part of the larger package, as we know, still in operation in the present. Sad.
Judi Lynn
(160,450 posts)
In August of 2004, Ambassador outlined the country teams 5 point strategy to guide embassy activities in Venezuela for the period (20042006) . . . The strategys focus is: 1) Strengthening Democratic Institutions, 2) Penetrating Chavez Political Base, 3) Dividing Chavismo, 4) Protecting Vital US business, and 5) Isolating Chavez internationally.
The close ties that exist between the US embassy and various opposition groups are apparent in numerous cables. One cable from Brownfield links Súmate an opposition NGO that played a central role in opposition campaigns to our interests in Venezuela. Other cables reveal that the State Department has lobbied for international support for Súmate and encouraged US financial, political, and legal support for the organization, much of it funneled through the NED.
In August 2009, Venezuela was rocked by violent opposition protests (as has occurred a number of times under both Chávez and his successor Nicolas Maduro). One secret cable from August 27 cites USAID/OTI contractor Development Alternatives, Incorporated (DAI) referring to all the people protesting Chávez at the time as our grantees:
(DAI employee) Eduardo Fernandez said that the streets are hot, referring to growing protests against Chavezs efforts to consolidate power, and all these people (organizing the protests) are our grantees.
The cables also reveal that the US State Department provided training and support to a student leader it acknowledged had led crowds with the intention to lynch a Chavista governor: During the coup of April 2002, (Nixon) Moreno participated in the demonstrations in Merida state, leading crowds who marched on the state capital to lynch MVR governor Florencio Porras.
Yet, a few years after this, another cable notes: Moreno participated in (a State Department) International Visitor Program in 2004.
Moreno would later be wanted for attempted murder and threatening a female police officer, among other charges.
Also in line with the five-point strategy as outlined by Brownfield, the State Department prioritized efforts to isolate the Venezuelan government internationally and counter its perceived influence throughout the region. Cables show how heads of US diplomatic missions in the region developed coordinating strategies to counter the Venezuelan regional threat.
As WikiLeaks first revealed in December 2010, the US chiefs of mission for six South American countries met in Brazil in May 2007 to develop a joint response to President Chávezs alleged aggressive plans to create a unified Bolivarian movement throughout Latin America. Among the areas of action that the mission chiefs agreed on was a plan to continue to strengthen ties to those military leaders in the region who share our concern over Chávez. A similar meeting of US mission chiefs from Central America focused on the threat of populist political activities in the region took place at the US embassy in El Salvador in March of 2006.
US diplomats went to great lengths to try to prevent Caribbean and Central American governments from joining Petrocaribe, a Venezuelan regional energy agreement that provides oil to members at extremely preferential terms. Leaked cables show that, while US officials privately acknowledged the economic benefits of the agreement for member countries, they were concerned that Petrocaribe would increase Venezuelas political influence in the region.
In Haiti, the embassy worked closely with big oil companies to try and prevent the government of René Préval from joining Petrocaribe, despite acknowledging that it would save USD 100 million per year, as was first reported by Dan Coughlin and Kim Ives in the Nation. In April 2006,the embassy cabled from Port-au-Prince: Post will continue to pressure (Haitian president René) Preval against joining PetroCaribe. Ambassador will see Prevals senior advisor Bob Manuel today. In previous meetings, he has acknowledged our concerns and is aware that a deal with Chavez would cause problems with us.
One of DAI's operatives in Venezuela's name was "Nixon Moreno." Really! Nixon. Moreno.
[center]
Nixon Moreno.[/center]
Judi Lynn
(160,450 posts)Despite the Obama administrations restoration of diplomatic relations with Cuba, there is no indication that policy toward Venezuela and other left governments in Latin America has fundamentally changed.
Certainly, the administrations hostility toward the elected Venezuelan government is unrelenting. In June 2014, Vice President Joe Biden launched the Caribbean Energy Security Initiative, seen as an antidote to Petrocaribe. In March 2015, Obama declared Venezuela an extraordinary security threat and announced sanctions against Venezuelan officials, a move unanimously criticized by other countries in the region.
But, despite incessant US aggression, the Left has largely prevailed in Latin America. With the exception of Honduras and Paraguay, where right-wing coups ousted elected leaders, nearly every left movement that came to power in the last fifteen years remains in office today.
Largely as a result of these governments, from 2002-2013 the poverty rate for the region fell from 44 to 28 percent after actually worsening over the prior two decades. These successes, and the willingness of left leaders to take risks in order to break free of the neoliberal diktat, should be an inspiration for Europes new anti-austerity left today.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)And what a betrayal of the United States' purpose and principles by our governments! Our Founders are rolling in their graves.
How Obama can look at himself in a mirror is beyond me.
No wonder we have no friends left, anywhere, except possibly Germany (and that won't last much longer).