Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latin America
Related: About this forumMedia continues to deny reality of the Cuba embargo
By Keith Bolender Last updated Aug 18, 2021
With few exceptions, corporate media has done its best to diminish the effects or ignore completely Americas regime change policies against Cuba.
The latest example of this ill-informed bias occurred last month during the protests throughout the island that generated considerable international attention. Overwhelmingly the media focused on the minority of protestors shouting anti-government slogans, providing much less coverage on the economic hardships, COVID restrictions and extended lockdowns that provided the underlying context to the protests. One issue that escaped serious analysis was the destructive impact of the United States embargo on Cubas social/economic conditions that played a predominant part in the protests.
The blockade, the main component of regime change strategy, has been used to punish the Cuban people for the past 60 years, with the United Nations reporting the economic damage has cost more than $130 billion. For the media, however, the embargo is something to be mentioned in passing, often at the end of articles. Or not at all. The lack of recognition is an attempt to deny the harm these policies impose on Cuba, and to shift the blame that all the revolutions supposed inadequacies are the responsibility of the government.
During the reporting of the protests, a few mainstream outlets mentioned the embargo, with NBC News article a day after waiting till the last paragraph to even acknowledge the embargo, noting the Cuban government attributes the economic crisis to US embargo against Cuba and sanctions, which former President Donald Trump intensified. When corporate media devotes little credibility to the blockade by relegating it to the end of the article, or reduces the harm by claiming its only the Cuban government complaining, it creates the false perception that the blockade has little importance, as the Washington Post did in its editorial of July 12, alleging that the Cubans blame everything on the embargo for their economic problems.
The BBC show remarkable self-discipline in determining what their readers should understand about the protests when they ran a story listing three things that were responsible number one the food shortages, number two the COVID situation, and number three the limitations of the internet in Cuba. What the report missed was reason number four the devastating impact of Americas blockade and regime change strategies. It can only be missed if the BBC wanted its audience to give the embargo no consideration.
When the embargo is the focus of media attention, the mis-information can be even more egregious.
A New York Times article, August 7, had as its headline, Cubans want more than end of embargo. The report, written by two staunch anti-revolutionary authors, purported that the embargo was the end talking point, not the starting position where all other issues of Cuban government shortcomings and faults should be addressed.
More:
https://progresoweekly.us/media-continues-to-deny-reality-of-the-cuba-embargo/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 467 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post