Latin America
Related: About this forumEcuador’s Correa Wins Another Libel Case: Are the Latin American Media Being Bullied?
Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa sued the wrong guys. In their 2010 book, El Gran Hermano (The Big Brother), Ecuadorean journalists Juan Carlos Calderón and Christian Zurita write that the Presidents older brother, Fabricio Correa, told them that the President knew all about the up to $120 million in federal construction contracts that firms tied to Fabricio were being awarded under a questionable bidding process (so questionable, in fact, that the President was eventually compelled to shut the policy down). Fabricio never denied telling the authors the President was aware of the possibly nepotistic contracts; in fact, Fabricio has since repeated it publicly.
So did an infuriated President Correa sue his chatty gran hermano for libel? Nope. He sued the journalists, for $5 million a piece even though newspaper reporting by Calderón and Zurita had helped convince him that the controversial bidding process should be scuttled. Still, wouldnt any judge with half a legal education dismiss the Presidents suit? Apparently not in Ecuador. This week, Quito Judge María Mercedes Portilla ordered the journalists to pay the President $1 million each because, she ruled, their book had scarred his honor, dignity and good name and had caused him spiritual damage. All this despite the fact that the authors themselves dont claim President Correa knew about his brothers contracts; rather, were quoting [Fabricio] as saying [the President] knew, Calderón told TIME in response to Portillas decision.
Read more: http://globalspin.blogs.time.com/2012/02/10/ecuadors-correa-wins-libel-case-the-latest-episode-in-the-war-on-latin-american-journalists/?xid=rss-topstories#ixzz1m6SHSF1l
ocpagu
(1,954 posts)...and then, in the first opportunity they have, they are inciting coups d'état, or organising coups themselves, or supporting right-wing dictactorships like they have been doing in Latin America for decades.
Well done Correa.
Zorro
(15,724 posts)Bucaram would still be in office robbing Ecuador blind if he had the same legal opportunity.
ocpagu
(1,954 posts)There's an interesting article about that published in the International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society in 1999.
http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=k476488763745460&size=largest
And yes, I applaud Correa. I would sue a newspaper if they accused me of committing a crime without evidences. Why shouldn't he? I really don't get why some people see "The Press" as some enchanted entity above good and evil. Really, it's just business. They don't want Correa out because they believe they will be doing a favor to the Ecuadorian people, they want Correa out because they're paid to lobby for that.
Zorro
(15,724 posts)and won him the election over Jaime Nebot, who since has been roundly castigated as the anti-Correa corporate favorite by our resident LatAm savants.
It would be wrong to assert that Bucaram was promoted as the preferred institutional candidate in that election. Bucaram won by promising the moon and acting the fool in public -- which garnered a lot of media attention -- and which the poor found much more entertaining and appealing than the more sober and capable Nebot.