Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hugin

(32,993 posts)
Sat May 5, 2012, 11:25 AM May 2012

Welcome to the Economy Group! Please read if you are new here.

Last edited Fri Nov 9, 2012, 11:02 AM - Edit history (1)



Our intention is that the group is welcoming to all, inclusive to differing points of view on
topics covering national/international issues related to and affecting our personal and collective economic well being.

To the right of the Blue "Post a Thread to this Group" button is a lighter blue button that says "About This Group"
Clicking on it will describe the host moderation functions and identify the current hosts of the group.

Come on in, pull up a chair, the more the merrier.

Always remember to keep those affected by natural and man-made disasters in your thoughts.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Welcome to the Economy Group! Please read if you are new here. (Original Post) Hugin May 2012 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Hugin May 2012 #1
Yes I would, conditional on a review of what it would involve on my part to do a good job. Dog Gone at Penigma Nov 2012 #4
Research needed tf.gray Aug 2012 #2
That would be complicated number crunching Dog Gone at Penigma Nov 2012 #3
Somewhere around a billion a year... JLII Dec 2012 #5
100% from American consumer! oldandhappy Jan 2013 #6
"as much assets as the bottom 42%"...not difficult bhikkhu Jul 2013 #9
and yet I keep shopping at Wal-Mart golfguru May 2013 #7
I suppose it varies for different people, and different areas bhikkhu Jul 2013 #8
I am fully aware they do not pay the help adequate wages/benefits. antues Aug 2013 #10
wtf? "+1, I agree" or tasty food? Hmmm. uppityperson Aug 2013 #11
I can only guess this is a case of MPS. Hugin Aug 2013 #12

Response to Hugin (Original post)

4. Yes I would, conditional on a review of what it would involve on my part to do a good job.
Fri Nov 23, 2012, 02:38 PM
Nov 2012

Could you please review for me what that would require, both in time and in my contribution?
Thanks for asking me.

tf.gray

(3 posts)
2. Research needed
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 11:54 PM
Aug 2012

It was recently revealed that the Walton (Walmart) family has as much assets as the bottom 42% of Americans combined. Can anyone crunch numbers to find out how much of that came from the US taxpayer, ie medicaid steping up in place of a corporate health plan? the money they make by using the interstate highway system? any other dodges they might utilize?

3. That would be complicated number crunching
Fri Nov 23, 2012, 02:36 PM
Nov 2012

First of all, it would need to reflect federal, state, AND local taxpayer contribution.
Secondly, presumably there are issues of individual privacy, which have puzzled me in the context of the existing figures being used - how does one determine the extent to which Walmart, and by extension, the Waltons, are profiting from the subsizing of their emplyees instead of them receiving adequate compensation and benefits?
And there would be a great deal of variation, store by store, for whatever special deals favorable to each WalMart operation might be cut, in terms of taxation, roads being created, etc.
I think it would take a long time, extensive resources, and a team of dedicated people to research.

 

JLII

(11 posts)
5. Somewhere around a billion a year...
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 07:42 PM
Dec 2012

... in direct subsidies due to employees qualifying for public assistance.

Depending on who one believes, add $300kk to another $bn in direct and indirect subsidies from state and locasl property tax exemptions and other corporate welfare.

This is what happens when corporations control both parties. Clinton/Rubin finished what Reagan started in terms of degrading the skilled blue collar workforce. Young Bush took their work opening borders to drive down wages to the next level.

There are dozens of links on these subjects; here is a decent one on the Walton operation as Welfare Queens...

http://makingchangeatwalmart.org/taxes-and-subsidies/

bhikkhu

(10,711 posts)
9. "as much assets as the bottom 42%"...not difficult
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 01:49 AM
Jul 2013

but also not especially meaningful. 65% of families in the US own homes, most of those are mortgaged, and a large percentage went upside-down on their mortgages in 2008 - owing more than the home's market value. Combine that with low savings rates, and the home being most people's the primary investment, and you have the bottom 42% (on a theoretical balance sheet, or at "liquidation value", if you will) worth next to nothing.

It is getting better this year, fairly fast, so that statement may not be true for very long.

 

golfguru

(4,987 posts)
7. and yet I keep shopping at Wal-Mart
Tue May 28, 2013, 01:26 AM
May 2013

I am fully aware they do not pay the help adequate wages/benefits.

But my own budget would suffer if I had to go somewhere else and pay
a whole bunch more.

bhikkhu

(10,711 posts)
8. I suppose it varies for different people, and different areas
Fri Jul 12, 2013, 01:44 AM
Jul 2013

but their grocery section in my town is way overpriced. I get better stuff cheaper at a regional chain store here, and they definitely have a better paid and happier staff, and a cleaner store.

Other stuff like clothes I tend towards goodwill, being a fairly dull dresser. Last year's styles are fine, and they really did used to make clothes better than they do now. Four washings and a w-mart t-shirt is see through.

Other stuff I might spend an extra dollar or two at a local hardware store, or someplace I know and like and don't mind patronizing. Or I might save more money and buy online, which I think is w-mart's real long-term problem. At least for me, its very easy not to shop there, and overall I save money.

antues

(6 posts)
10. I am fully aware they do not pay the help adequate wages/benefits.
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 12:08 PM
Aug 2013

I am fully aware they do not pay the help adequate wages/benefits.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Welcome to the Economy Gr...