Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
as of 7 PM EDT. But check back later...to be sure.
And How about that DOW?!! Talk about a last minute plunge!
You just can't keep a bad market up....
And I especially like that quote.
"We're yearning for something beyond the every day."
The stuff dreams are made of.
http://www.businessinsider.com/details-emerge-on-amazons-cia-cloud-2013-6
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos
Amazon's $600 million contract to build a cloud for the CIA might not happen. But if it does, it will be something Amazon has never done before: a so-called 'private' cloud built in a customer's data center.
If the project proceeds as planned, that would be a game-changer in the fledgling $131 billion cloud computing market.
To recap: In March, news broke that Amazon won a massive contract with the CIA but the details were sketchy. Amazon and the CIA were tight-lipped.
AWS is the largest "public" cloud provider, meaning the hardware is stored in its own data center and many users share it. That's what keeps the costs down. Private clouds use the same technologies, but are located in a company's own data center and not shared with others.
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos
Amazon's $600 million contract to build a cloud for the CIA might not happen. But if it does, it will be something Amazon has never done before: a so-called 'private' cloud built in a customer's data center.
If the project proceeds as planned, that would be a game-changer in the fledgling $131 billion cloud computing market.
To recap: In March, news broke that Amazon won a massive contract with the CIA but the details were sketchy. Amazon and the CIA were tight-lipped.
AWS is the largest "public" cloud provider, meaning the hardware is stored in its own data center and many users share it. That's what keeps the costs down. Private clouds use the same technologies, but are located in a company's own data center and not shared with others.
http://www.businessinsider.com/great-graphic-world-gdp-2013-6
This Great Graphic comes from The Economist. It depicts world GDP on a year-over year basis for the world, high income countries, the BRICS and other emerging markets.
The Economist estimates that world growth slowed to a 2.1% pace in Q1 13, down a full percentage point from Q1 12. The high incomes countries are barely growing net-net. Europe is largely in recession. US growth in Q1 has been revised lower. The prospects for Q2 look poor. US growth has not improved, though the euro zone contraction may have eased, it is still appears to be contracting. Japanese growth is likely to lead again, with both exports and domestic consumption continuing to recover.
Emerging market often grow faster than the high income countries, though it does not always lead to superior asset returns. The BRICS have slowed, as have other emerging markets. The sharp rise in global interest rates starting in late-May will not help matters. The increase in interest rates is not a reflection of greater demand for capital due to increased activity. Rather the rise in rates reflects portfolio adjustments in response to the tapering talk the US (less stimulus is not the same thing as no stimulus), continued selling of foreign assets by Japanese investors, and the liquidity squeeze in China.
Read more: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcToMarket/~3/rPKqQy8S-hQ/great-graphic-world-gdp.html#ixzz2Xc0c3l7x
This Great Graphic comes from The Economist. It depicts world GDP on a year-over year basis for the world, high income countries, the BRICS and other emerging markets.
The Economist estimates that world growth slowed to a 2.1% pace in Q1 13, down a full percentage point from Q1 12. The high incomes countries are barely growing net-net. Europe is largely in recession. US growth in Q1 has been revised lower. The prospects for Q2 look poor. US growth has not improved, though the euro zone contraction may have eased, it is still appears to be contracting. Japanese growth is likely to lead again, with both exports and domestic consumption continuing to recover.
Emerging market often grow faster than the high income countries, though it does not always lead to superior asset returns. The BRICS have slowed, as have other emerging markets. The sharp rise in global interest rates starting in late-May will not help matters. The increase in interest rates is not a reflection of greater demand for capital due to increased activity. Rather the rise in rates reflects portfolio adjustments in response to the tapering talk the US (less stimulus is not the same thing as no stimulus), continued selling of foreign assets by Japanese investors, and the liquidity squeeze in China.
Read more: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcToMarket/~3/rPKqQy8S-hQ/great-graphic-world-gdp.html#ixzz2Xc0c3l7x
http://www.nationofchange.org/commercial-colonisation-africa-1372434364
The New Wild West
Dancing to the tune of their corporate benefactors, governments of the ruling G8 countries are enacting complex agriculture agreements delivering large tracts of prime cut African soil into the portfolios of their multinational bedmates.
Desperate for foreign investment, countries throughout Africa are at the mercy of their new colonial masters – national and international agrochemical corporations, fighting for land, water and control of the world’s food supplies. Driven overwhelmingly by self-interest and profit, the current crop of ‘investors’ differ little from their colonial ancestors. The means may have changed, but the aim – to rape and pillage, no matter the sincere sounding rhetoric, remains more or less the same.
Regarded by her northern guides as agriculturally underperforming, Sub-Saharan Africa is seen The African Centre for Bio-diversity (ACB) relate, as a “new frontier”, a place to “make profits, with an eye on land, food and biofuels in particular". Africa, then, is the new Wild West; smallholder farmers and indigenous people are the natives Indians, the multi nationals and their democratically elected representatives – or salesmen - the settlers.
Various initiatives offering what is, indisputably, much needed ‘support and investment’ flowing north to south. Key amongst these is The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition in Africa (NAFSNA), designed by the governments of the eight richest economies, for some of the poorest countries in the world. The New Alliance was born out of the G8 summit in May 2012 at Camp David and, according to, War on Want (WoW), “has been modelled on the ‘new vision’ of private investment in agriculture developed by management consultants McKinsey in conjunction with the ABCD group of leading grain traders (ADM, Bunge, Cargill and Louis Dreyfus) and other multinational agribusiness companies.” (Ibid) It has been written in honourable terms to sit comfortably within the Africa Union’s Comprehensive African Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP), bestowing an aura of international credibility.
The New Wild West
Dancing to the tune of their corporate benefactors, governments of the ruling G8 countries are enacting complex agriculture agreements delivering large tracts of prime cut African soil into the portfolios of their multinational bedmates.
Desperate for foreign investment, countries throughout Africa are at the mercy of their new colonial masters – national and international agrochemical corporations, fighting for land, water and control of the world’s food supplies. Driven overwhelmingly by self-interest and profit, the current crop of ‘investors’ differ little from their colonial ancestors. The means may have changed, but the aim – to rape and pillage, no matter the sincere sounding rhetoric, remains more or less the same.
Regarded by her northern guides as agriculturally underperforming, Sub-Saharan Africa is seen The African Centre for Bio-diversity (ACB) relate, as a “new frontier”, a place to “make profits, with an eye on land, food and biofuels in particular". Africa, then, is the new Wild West; smallholder farmers and indigenous people are the natives Indians, the multi nationals and their democratically elected representatives – or salesmen - the settlers.
Various initiatives offering what is, indisputably, much needed ‘support and investment’ flowing north to south. Key amongst these is The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition in Africa (NAFSNA), designed by the governments of the eight richest economies, for some of the poorest countries in the world. The New Alliance was born out of the G8 summit in May 2012 at Camp David and, according to, War on Want (WoW), “has been modelled on the ‘new vision’ of private investment in agriculture developed by management consultants McKinsey in conjunction with the ABCD group of leading grain traders (ADM, Bunge, Cargill and Louis Dreyfus) and other multinational agribusiness companies.” (Ibid) It has been written in honourable terms to sit comfortably within the Africa Union’s Comprehensive African Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP), bestowing an aura of international credibility.
