Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cheyanne

(733 posts)
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 03:55 PM Dec 2013

NYT on Volker Rule: loopholes, I don't understand

Peter Eavis's article in the NYT on the Volker Rule contains many interesting bits about the loopholes available to banks.

I don't know anything about banking, but one quote from a director at Deloitte & Touche is about whether banks should be making trades for themselves as well as customers.

The director seems to be saying that the banks don't have an easy way to separate their trades from customers. Here's the quote.


"You could have a trading blotter that contains thousands of trades a day, and figuring out what goes with what could be difficult."


Does this mean that presently banks put everybody's trades in a pot and then allocates what they "think" is the right amounts to all?

Please explain.

thanks.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT on Volker Rule: loopholes, I don't understand (Original Post) cheyanne Dec 2013 OP
I thought that was the problem with Hillary's cattle pscot Dec 2013 #1
Sounds like it. elleng Dec 2013 #2

pscot

(21,024 posts)
1. I thought that was the problem with Hillary's cattle
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 04:05 PM
Dec 2013

futures windfall back in the day. Profitable trades were allocated (steered? ) to her account. Some animals are more equal than others, it would seem.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»NYT on Volker Rule: looph...