Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's a good one... (Original Post) clarice Feb 2014 OP
Money is just a token. CJCRANE Feb 2014 #1
AND how and if you EARN them. nt clarice Feb 2014 #2
IMO everyone should get enough tokens CJCRANE Feb 2014 #3
But who would regluate... clarice Feb 2014 #4
We (humans) make the rules. We can decide what outcome we want CJCRANE Feb 2014 #5
agreed..... clarice Feb 2014 #6
The average worker isn't the problem. CJCRANE Feb 2014 #7
again, agreed... clarice Feb 2014 #8
We're pretty much on the same page. CJCRANE Feb 2014 #9
Yes we are....let me run this one by you. clarice Feb 2014 #10
That sounds fine by me. CJCRANE Feb 2014 #11
Thanks, good luck CJ. nt clarice Feb 2014 #12

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
3. IMO everyone should get enough tokens
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 04:54 PM
Feb 2014

to provide for the basic necessities of life: food, healthcare, shelter.

People who work hard, or are in leadership positions or who provide a specialist service should get a few more tokens, but not exponentially more.

Throw in progressive taxation so the government can provide healthcare, education and security.

That's pretty much it as I see it. Shouldn't be too difficult to implement...



 

clarice

(5,504 posts)
4. But who would regluate...
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 04:58 PM
Feb 2014

How much more these "positions" should earn? Seems to me to be a very slippery slope.
I sure wouldn't want anyone putting a "cap" on what I could or should earn.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
5. We (humans) make the rules. We can decide what outcome we want
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 05:01 PM
Feb 2014

from the system.

If we want a few people sitting on hoards of wealth doing nothing with it, then let's stick with what we've got.

 

clarice

(5,504 posts)
6. agreed.....
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 05:05 PM
Feb 2014

But wouldn't it be a bit "unwieldy" to have every person in every company meet
every time some one deserved a raise? I'm still not sure that I would want my lovely
co-workers to decide my economic future. lol

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
7. The average worker isn't the problem.
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 05:10 PM
Feb 2014

It's the directors CEOs making 300 times the average wage or the bankers who receive a huge salary plus a bonus equivalent to double or triple their salary.

That's where it's out of balance.

I think that huge wealth at the top should be shifted down towards the middle a bit more.

 

clarice

(5,504 posts)
8. again, agreed...
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 05:20 PM
Feb 2014

I wasn't talking about those CEO assholes or Trust Fund Babies,
I was speaking more of average people like us.

IE: my original post. When you think about it, money is really a very simple,
innocent, pure concept. At it's core, it is a way to be rewarded for
your goods/services/labor comenserate with your abilities to provide them.*

*again, discounting big corporate mucky - mucks.lol

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
9. We're pretty much on the same page.
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 05:31 PM
Feb 2014

Money is fine when it's related to the real economy.

The problem came when the banks and corporations figured out a way to make money disconnected from the real economy, e.g. all the collateralized debt obligations, credit default swaps etc.

 

clarice

(5,504 posts)
10. Yes we are....let me run this one by you.
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 05:39 PM
Feb 2014

I've always thought that if we where to remove oil/gas from
the commodities board, we would eliminate the manipulation from
short sellers and contract brokers. It's amazing how much their chicanery
affects us at the pumps. Your thoughts on this ?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Here's a good one...