Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sat Jul 5, 2014, 07:48 PM Jul 2014

Krugman: Build We Won’t

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/04/opinion/paul-krugman-build-we-wont.html

But no. We can’t simply write a check to the highway fund, we’re told, because that would increase the deficit. And deficits are evil, at least when there’s a Democrat in the White House, even if the government can borrow at incredibly low interest rates. And we can’t raise gas taxes because that would be a tax increase, and tax increases are even more evil than deficits. So our roads must be allowed to fall into disrepair.

If this sounds crazy, that’s because it is. But similar logic lies behind the overall plunge in public investment. Most such investment is carried out by state and local governments, which generally must run balanced budgets and saw revenue decline after the housing bust. But the federal government could have supported public investment through deficit-financed grants, and states themselves could have raised more revenue (which some but not all did). The collapse of public investment was, therefore, a political choice.

What’s useful about the looming highway crisis is that it illustrates just how self-destructive that political choice has become. It’s one thing to block green investment, or high-speed rail, or even school construction. I’m for such things, but many on the right aren’t. But everyone from progressive think tanks to the United States Chamber of Commerce thinks we need good roads. Yet the combination of anti-tax ideology and deficit hysteria (itself mostly whipped up in an attempt to bully President Obama into spending cuts) means that we’re letting our highways, and our future, erode away.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: Build We Won’t (Original Post) eridani Jul 2014 OP
About as well as can be said. mbperrin Jul 2014 #1
Yup, Interest rates are low, its a good time to borrow FogerRox Jul 2014 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Cayenne Jul 2014 #2
Feminists had no particular opinion one way or another eridani Jul 2014 #3

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
1. About as well as can be said.
Sat Jul 5, 2014, 10:40 PM
Jul 2014

Should be building and repairing at bargain rates, but instead, we go backwards.

At the state level, too. In Texas, for the first time since 1938, 83 miles of highway will be built as gravel road, not pavement. Imagine! 76 years of progress gone in a breath!

Response to eridani (Original post)

eridani

(51,907 posts)
3. Feminists had no particular opinion one way or another
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 01:09 AM
Jul 2014

Liberals mostly thought it was inadequate, which is basically what Krugman is saying here.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Krugman: Build We Won’t