Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Thu May 28, 2015, 08:53 AM May 2015

Stop Calling the TPP a Trade Agreement — It Isn’t

http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/dave-johnson/62403/stop-calling-the-tpp-a-trade-agreement-it-isn-t

Stop Calling the TPP a Trade Agreement — It Isn’t
Corporate America | Economic Policy | Trade
by Dave Johnson | May 27, 2015 - 7:42am

This is a message to activists trying to fight the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Stop calling the TPP a “trade” agreement. TPP is a corporate/investor rights agreement, not a “trade” agreement. “Trade” is a good thing; TPP is not. Every time you use the word “trade” in association with the TPP, you are helping the other side.

“Trade” is a propaganda word. It short-circuits thinking. People hear “trade” and the brain stops working. People think, “Of course, trade is good.” And that ends the discussion.

Calling TPP a “trade” agreement lets the pro-TPP people argue that TPP is about trade instead of what it is really about. It diverts attention from the real problem. It enables advocates to say things like, “95 percent of the world lives outside the U.S.” as if that has anything to do with TPP. It lets them say, “We know that exports support American jobs” to sell a corporate rights agreement. It enables them to say nonsense like this about a corporate rights agreement designed to send American jobs to Vietnam so a few “investors” can pocket the wage difference: “Exports of U.S. goods and services supported an estimated 9.8 million American jobs, including 25 percent of all manufacturing jobs … and those export-supported jobs pay 13 to 18 percent higher than the national average wage.”

Trade is good. Opening up the border so you can get bananas and they can get fertilizer is trade because they have a climate that lets them grow bananas and you already have a fertilizer plant. Enabling companies to move $30/hour jobs to countries with $.60/hour wages so a few billionaires can pocket the difference is not trade.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stop Calling the TPP a Trade Agreement — It Isn’t (Original Post) unhappycamper May 2015 OP
K&R.... daleanime May 2015 #1
That is absolutely correct Art_from_Ark May 2015 #2
Yup. Only five chapters are about trade. djean111 May 2015 #3

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
2. That is absolutely correct
Thu May 28, 2015, 09:00 AM
May 2015

It is little more than an abominable attempt to enable certain corporations to shake every dollar/yen/peso/sol out of the 99%ers that they can.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
3. Yup. Only five chapters are about trade.
Thu May 28, 2015, 09:14 AM
May 2015
Trade is good. Opening up the border so you can get bananas and they can get fertilizer is trade because they have a climate that lets them grow bananas and you already have a fertilizer plant. Enabling companies to move $30/hour jobs to countries with $.60/hour wages so a few billionaires can pocket the difference is not trade.


One of the most assiduous TPP pushers here is quite open about hoping and wanting American jobs to go elsewhere. The sad part is that Americans losing jobs will not raise the wages or working conditions anywhere else. The corporations are quite clear about that. They move jobs to save money, not to raise workers up.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Stop Calling the TPP a Tr...