Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
DoorDash Is Proof of How Easy It Is to Exploit Workers When Their Boss Is an Algorithm
Source: Gizmodo
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
DoorDash Is Proof of How Easy It Is to Exploit Workers When Their Boss Is an Algorithm
Brian Merchant
Yesterday 1:00pm Filed to: AUTOMATON
Were getting quite used to our algorithmic overlords. Weve ceded, for the most part, that complex and invisible rulesets determine who will see our missives, travel pics, and RT dunks. More substantially, millions of workers now toil, essentially, for algorithms, whether via Uber, Lyft, Postmates, or the like. And the DoorDash tipping fiasco that unfolded this week highlights how increasingly dangerous this isboth in terms of the worker exploitation that nebulous algorithmic employment allowed for in the first place, and in the fractious and sometimes surprising nature of the fallout.
When DoorDash, which, with 400,000 contract workers is the largest on-demand food delivery service in the nation, faced fresh criticism over its deceptive tipping policiesthe app used tips from consumers to pay out the minimum delivery fee it promised its gig workers, called Dashers, instead of letting them keep the whole tip themselves, essentially putting the tip directly in DoorDashs coffersit finally capitulated. After six months of refusing to do so, CEO Tony Xu announced on Twitter hed be changing the policy.
-snip-
But infighting on internet forums is whats prone to happen when your manager is an algorithmtheres no sense in arguing with a set of instructions encoded in software, after all. It may be uncharitable, but if you felt like you, personally, had finally mastered the rules, lashing out at those who spoiled the game at least makes a certain kind of sense. The only means a lot of gig workers have to register grievances are ineffectual customer support email addresseswhich often connect them to equally poorly paid representatives around the worldand each other.
The company, after all, typically only gets in touch via the app, and only with automated boilerplate. In lieu of clear and direct communications from companies, many gig workers turn to online forums and groups, looking for others who might have more information and banding together to trade documents and tips to ensure they are receiving what they have been promised, Johana Bhuiyan wrote for the LA Times. The asymmetry in information, fragmented nature of the workforce and fear of retaliation make it possible for companies like DoorDash and Amazon to implement questionable labor practices like these, often without significant pushback.
Now, there are a lot of workers, from Uber drivers to Dashers, who are organizing for change. Groups like Gig Workers Rising are gaining steam. But the blowback on Dasher forums highlights the steepness of their challenge: By imparting the rules and expectations of the job onto a faceless algorithmrules that govern pickup rates, bonus terms, and payscale, and rules that are always wildly in fluxon-demand app companies have fundamentally altered how workers perceive and engage with the authorities that manage them.
-snip-
DoorDash Is Proof of How Easy It Is to Exploit Workers When Their Boss Is an Algorithm
Brian Merchant
Yesterday 1:00pm Filed to: AUTOMATON
Were getting quite used to our algorithmic overlords. Weve ceded, for the most part, that complex and invisible rulesets determine who will see our missives, travel pics, and RT dunks. More substantially, millions of workers now toil, essentially, for algorithms, whether via Uber, Lyft, Postmates, or the like. And the DoorDash tipping fiasco that unfolded this week highlights how increasingly dangerous this isboth in terms of the worker exploitation that nebulous algorithmic employment allowed for in the first place, and in the fractious and sometimes surprising nature of the fallout.
When DoorDash, which, with 400,000 contract workers is the largest on-demand food delivery service in the nation, faced fresh criticism over its deceptive tipping policiesthe app used tips from consumers to pay out the minimum delivery fee it promised its gig workers, called Dashers, instead of letting them keep the whole tip themselves, essentially putting the tip directly in DoorDashs coffersit finally capitulated. After six months of refusing to do so, CEO Tony Xu announced on Twitter hed be changing the policy.
-snip-
But infighting on internet forums is whats prone to happen when your manager is an algorithmtheres no sense in arguing with a set of instructions encoded in software, after all. It may be uncharitable, but if you felt like you, personally, had finally mastered the rules, lashing out at those who spoiled the game at least makes a certain kind of sense. The only means a lot of gig workers have to register grievances are ineffectual customer support email addresseswhich often connect them to equally poorly paid representatives around the worldand each other.
The company, after all, typically only gets in touch via the app, and only with automated boilerplate. In lieu of clear and direct communications from companies, many gig workers turn to online forums and groups, looking for others who might have more information and banding together to trade documents and tips to ensure they are receiving what they have been promised, Johana Bhuiyan wrote for the LA Times. The asymmetry in information, fragmented nature of the workforce and fear of retaliation make it possible for companies like DoorDash and Amazon to implement questionable labor practices like these, often without significant pushback.
Now, there are a lot of workers, from Uber drivers to Dashers, who are organizing for change. Groups like Gig Workers Rising are gaining steam. But the blowback on Dasher forums highlights the steepness of their challenge: By imparting the rules and expectations of the job onto a faceless algorithmrules that govern pickup rates, bonus terms, and payscale, and rules that are always wildly in fluxon-demand app companies have fundamentally altered how workers perceive and engage with the authorities that manage them.
-snip-
Read more: https://gizmodo.com/doordash-is-proof-of-how-easy-it-is-to-exploit-workers-1836729119
______________________________________________________________________
Related: DoorDash Says Its Very Sorry You Noticed Its Tip-Skimming Scheme (Gizmodo)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1443 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DoorDash Is Proof of How Easy It Is to Exploit Workers When Their Boss Is an Algorithm (Original Post)
Eugene
Jul 2019
OP
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)1. Their Boss
The real human one(s) need be arrested and charged with theft. They are simply common criminals.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)2. DoorDash, Uber, Lyft, etc.
Their business model is "Burn yourself out, run your car into the ground, and eventually, we'll replace you with a robot."