Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue May 27, 2014, 09:23 AM May 2014

Will The Supreme Court Kill Public-Employee Unions?

Forget Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and his fellow union-bashing governors. Forget the partisan Republican attacks on organized labor. The gravest threat today to public-employee unions—which represent cops, firefighters, prison guards, teachers, nurses, and other city and state workers—is a Supreme Court case named Harris v. Quinn, which could be decided as early as this Tuesday. And, strangely enough, it is the court's most sharp-tongued conservative, Justice Antonin Scalia, who could ride to organized labor's rescue.

The case pits several of the nation's mightiest labor unions, such as the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), against their longstanding foe, the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, which helped bring the case. National Right to Work is funded by some of the biggest names in conservative philanthropy: the Bradley family, the Waltons of Walmart, Charles Koch, and DonorsTrust and Donors Capital Fund, two dark-money ATMs. Labor officials see Harris as an effort by the deep-pocketed conservative movement to wipe public-employee unions off the map—and to demolish a major source of funding and support for the Democratic Party. "This is an attempted kill shot aimed at public-sector unions," says Bill Lurye, AFSCME's general counsel.

The origins of Harris date to July 2003, when the Illinois legislature passed a bill recognizing certain home-care providers as "public employees" and designating a Midwest branch of SEIU to exclusively represent those workers. Before that, these workers were deemed independent contractors with no union representation, even though the Illinois government paid them with federal health-care funds. In June 2009, Gov. Pat Quinn, a Democrat, went one step further. By executive order, Quinn declared the state's disability-care providers, another type of home-care worker, eligible for exclusive union representation. (Ultimately, the disability providers voted against unionizing.)

Organized labor hailed these moves. Unions see a huge opportunity in the rapidly growing population of elderly Americans—what SEIU president Mary Kay Henry calls the "silver tsunami." Labor leaders believe that organizing home-care workers across the country could slow the decline in union membership.

more
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/05/supreme-court-harris-quinn-unions-right-to-work

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will The Supreme Court Kill Public-Employee Unions? (Original Post) n2doc May 2014 OP
Probably. nt ladjf May 2014 #1
They will do what they're paid to do by their conservative benefactors. mountain grammy May 2014 #2
+1 daleanime May 2014 #3

mountain grammy

(26,598 posts)
2. They will do what they're paid to do by their conservative benefactors.
Tue May 27, 2014, 10:01 PM
May 2014

I have a pain in my gut at the notion that Scalia could decide this case for the unions. I just don't see it happening.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»Will The Supreme Court Ki...