Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 04:38 AM Oct 2016

Re: Coal ash hexavalent chromium drinking water contamination in VA & NC

This summer a study out of Duke University prompted this reporting:
Upper James Riverkeeper: Duke Study Shows Coal Ash Ponds Leak Contaminants
Thursday, 23 June 2016 12:40
http://www.waterkeeperschesapeake.com/about-us/resources/item/189-duke-study-shows-coal-ash-ponds-leak-contaminants

Duke University tests find leaching from ash sites, including two in Va.
http://www.roanoke.com/news/duke-university-tests-find-leaching-from-ash-sites-including-two/article_c54467cb-7e6a-523e-8cdf-fd9fde181c45.html


Now, a follow up study brings news even more dire.

Duke University report: Hexavalent chromium widespread but naturally occurring
October 26, 2016 10:45 pm
By ROBERT ZULLO Richmond Times-Dispatch


At the Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center, land is graded and prepared at the landfill where by-products of coal combustion (coal ash) will be deposited. August 31, 2016.


Hexavalent chromium contamination of hundreds of private drinking-water wells near Duke Energy coal ash facilities ...

... into the middle of that roiling feud fell a bombshell Wednesday, when a study released by a team of Duke University-led researchers concluded that the potentially carcinogenic metal that was found in 90 percent of the 376 North Carolina wells sampled is naturally occurring....

Vengosh’s team has developed a testing method that uses distinctive isotope tracers of boron and strontium associated with coal ash to link contamination to the unlined ponds where the waste has been stored for decades. The technique was the basis of a report Vengosh and his team published this past summer that found leaking coal ash ponds at 21 facilities in five states...

<snip>

“Overall, the geochemical and isotopic data clearly indicate that the drinking-water wells tested in this study are not impacted by CCR (coal combustion residuals) effluents and therefore the coal ash ponds are not a likely source” of the elevated chromium levels, says the study, published in Environmental Science and Technology Letters.

Far from being a cause for celebration, though, Vengosh said the report demonstrates that hexavalent chromium contamination, albeit naturally occurring, is more widespread in the Piedmont region — which covers a swath that runs from southeastern Pennsylvania, through central Virginia and North Carolina and into South Carolina, northern Georgia and eastern Alabama — than previously realized.

“If anything, because the contamination stems from water-rock interactions that are common across the Piedmont region, people in a much larger geographic area may be at risk. This is not limited only to wells near coal ash ponds,” Vengosh said....


More at: http://www.richmond.com/news/article_2af6db34-0f85-5410-b4c3-3a17689d9261.html


See also: National Institute of Health's National Toxicity Program
Hexavalent Chromium
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/materials/hexavalent_chromium_508.pdf
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Re: Coal ash hexavalent chromium drinking water contamination in VA & NC (Original Post) kristopher Oct 2016 OP
This explains a lot. safeinOhio Oct 2016 #1
Um, that sounds kind of convenient... are we really supposed to believe it's natural? Fast Walker 52 Oct 2016 #2
If their findings can be replicated by other researchers... paleotn Oct 2016 #3
well, sure. I just wasn't sure what point was being made Fast Walker 52 Oct 2016 #4
If you mean the point of posting the information...? kristopher Oct 2016 #5

safeinOhio

(32,669 posts)
1. This explains a lot.
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 06:51 AM
Oct 2016

"which covers a swath that runs from southeastern Pennsylvania, through central Virginia and North Carolina and into South Carolina, northern Georgia and eastern Alabama"

Might also want to check for it in Florida, Texas and Alaska.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
5. If you mean the point of posting the information...?
Thu Oct 27, 2016, 09:54 AM
Oct 2016

Seemed like a good idea to raise awareness of a possible contaminate in the water supply. If it is as widespread as it appears, the problem might extend beyond individually owned wells - although that by itself is good information to bring out.

As for the contradiction between the two studies, I agree with the point made by paleo, it is a measurable and reproducible claim. If there is some sort of shenanigan, it will be exposed pretty quick.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Re: Coal ash hexavalent c...