Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumNext-Generation Nuclear Power? Not Just Yet
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603573/next-generation-nuclear-power-not-just-yet/[font face=Serif][font size=5]Next-Generation Nuclear Power? Not Just Yet[/font]
[font size=4]The West is struggling to build out safer reactors, but China shows no such delays.[/font]
by Jamie Condliffe | February 3, 2017
[font size=3]New kinds of safer, simpler nuclear reactors are having a hard time becoming a realityat least in certain countries.
Bloomberg reports that the nuclear industry is currently struggling to build out power production facilities that are supposed to make use of new generation III+ pressurized water uranium fission reactors. While generation III reactors have been in use since 1996, the newer "plus" versions are supposed to incorporate extra safety features and require less operator input.
Problem is, theyre proving rather tricky to actually build. Projects in France, Finland, and the U.S. are running behind schedule and over budget. And newly committed projects, such as the U.K.s Hinkley Point, are shaping up to be eye-wateringly expensive.
What gives? According to Lake Barrett, a former official at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission who spoke to Bloomberg: The cost overrun situation is driven by a near-perfect storm of societal risk aversion to nuclear causing ultra-restrictive regulatory requirements, construction complexity, and lack of nuclear construction experience by the industry.
[/font][/font]
[font size=4]The West is struggling to build out safer reactors, but China shows no such delays.[/font]
by Jamie Condliffe | February 3, 2017
[font size=3]New kinds of safer, simpler nuclear reactors are having a hard time becoming a realityat least in certain countries.
Bloomberg reports that the nuclear industry is currently struggling to build out power production facilities that are supposed to make use of new generation III+ pressurized water uranium fission reactors. While generation III reactors have been in use since 1996, the newer "plus" versions are supposed to incorporate extra safety features and require less operator input.
Problem is, theyre proving rather tricky to actually build. Projects in France, Finland, and the U.S. are running behind schedule and over budget. And newly committed projects, such as the U.K.s Hinkley Point, are shaping up to be eye-wateringly expensive.
What gives? According to Lake Barrett, a former official at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission who spoke to Bloomberg: The cost overrun situation is driven by a near-perfect storm of societal risk aversion to nuclear causing ultra-restrictive regulatory requirements, construction complexity, and lack of nuclear construction experience by the industry.
[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 739 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Next-Generation Nuclear Power? Not Just Yet (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Feb 2017
OP
Finishline42
(1,091 posts)1. Just like the last time the nuclear power plant industry hit the skids
From the article:
construction complexity, and lack of nuclear construction experience by the industry.
It's what happens when you have to choose between contractors and low bid wins...
FogerRox
(13,211 posts)2. 24 billion USD yahowza
Not that I miss the day when a good nuke plant could be built for 8 billion....