Red State America Acts on Climate Change--but Calls It Other Names
Surveys of Great Plains mayors show policies push conservation, air quality, energy savings
There's a lesson here on messaging I suppose..
My colleagues and I did a survey of over 200 local governments in 11 states of the Great Plains region to learn about steps theyre taking to mitigate the effects of climate change and to adapt to them. We found local officials in red states responsible for public health, soil conservation, parks and natural resources management, as well as county commissioners and mayors, are concerned about climate change, and many feel a responsibility to take action in the absence of national policy.
But because it is such a complex and polarizing topic, they often face public uncertainty or outrage toward the issue. So while these local officials have been addressing climate change in their communities over the past decade, many of these policy activities are specifically not framed that way. As one respondent to our survey said:
It is my personal and professional opinion that the conservation community is on track with addressing the issue of climate change but is way off track in assigning a cause. The public understands the value of clean water and clean air. If the need to improve our water quality and air quality was emphasized, most would agree. Who is going to say dirty water and dirty air is not a problem? By making the argument climate change and humans are the cause significant energy is wasted trying to prove this. It is also something the public has a hard time sinking their teeth into.