Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,884 posts)
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 02:29 PM Jul 2017

Small Fees for Access to Public Lands Changes How Some Use the Outdoors

It’s less than the cost of bug spray – but to some people and their wallets, that amount still matters – and affects where they visit outdoors, recent research by Chase Lamborn, and others at Utah State University’s Institute of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism has found.

Recreation fees change how people use public lands, even when the actual cost seems insignificant. Millcreek Canyon, for instance, charges just $3 per day per vehicle. This high-mountain retreat of meandering mountain bike routes, narrow hiking trails and simple picnic areas in the Central Wasatch Mountain of northern Utah has plenty of paying visitors. There are also other spots nearby to wander through the wildflowers or pump a bike up a rocky path without handing over cash. The question that Lamborn posed was this: Do the same kind of people use both places?

No, it turns out they don’t. Although there wasn’t any difference in the makeup of the overall race, ethnicity, age or even the types of recreation the two groups were interested in, there were significant differences in annual household income. A fee – even a $3 one – displaced low-income recreationists. In fact, low-income people (who earned less than $25,000 per year) drove out of their way to avoid the fee. They traveled three times as far to reach the “cheaper” alternative.

The majority of recreation areas in the Central Wasatch Mountains don’t require a fee. But that may change. As the burgeoning population around nearby Salt Lake City expands, so does demand on recreation sites. The Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest is considering a $6 per-vehicle fee to access areas that have up to know been free of charge.

https://www.usu.edu/today/index.cfm?id=56909&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WYM-07212017-Affiliate&utm_content=WYM-07212017-Affiliate+CID_adf17f97b6655c86a0cfbaf928bab787&utm_source=campaignmonitor%20outsidemagazine&utm_term=discourages%20low-income%20families%20from%20accessing%20the%20outdoors

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Small Fees for Access to Public Lands Changes How Some Use the Outdoors (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2017 OP
Some people will spend more on gasoline to avoid a fee... SeattleVet Jul 2017 #1
Once the gas is in the tank, it's free. $3.00 is cash out of your hand right now. Shrike47 Jul 2017 #2

SeattleVet

(5,477 posts)
1. Some people will spend more on gasoline to avoid a fee...
Sat Jul 22, 2017, 02:38 PM
Jul 2017

than the fee would have been.

Reminds me of my grandmother, back in the day. She'd drive from store to store to save a penny or two on an item, and wind using a LOT of gasoline in the process, tus really coming out behind in the long run.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Small Fees for Access to ...