Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,583 posts)
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 11:35 AM Nov 2018

CA Burns, 9 Dead & Shitstain Threatens To Cut Off Funding: "Remedy Now Or No More Fed Payments!"

At least nine people are known dead and over a quarter million have been evacuated as the combination of gale-force winds and microscopic humidity drive walls of flames across both ends of California. Whole communities have been burned down, residents have lost their lives on highways in desperate attempts to escape, and firefighters are desperately trying to contain some of the blazes on Saturday with higher winds expected again on Sunday.

Against this deadly inferno, with tens of thousands of emergency personal putting their lives on the line and the risk still growing, it might seem like the appropriate time for a leader to issue emergency orders freeing up more funds, sending in military forces to relieve weary first responders, offering every possible assistance to the nation’s most populous state at a time of utter disaster. That’s what a leader might do. If we had a leader.




Donald Trump’s only mention of the fires in California — his only mention — is a spiteful threat to cut off funding even as people are dying. During another round of fires in August, Trump made similar threats after demanding that California practice clear cutting to remove forests. But as the Sacramento Bee pointed out at the time, Trump has already slashed federal funds for forest management in California.

Trump obviously relishes the chance to tell California to go to hell—even when the people there are experiencing literal hell. And he probably thinks that his sneering at burning homes and dying children on the West Coast will play well in red states where they can think of better ways to spend the money that was collected from blue states. Just because California makes the biggest contribution to the federal budget by far doesn’t mean it should get anything back. What’s saving lives next to paying for subsidies on something that needs subsidies because of a Trump-imposed sanction?

EDIT

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/11/10/1811771/-As-fires-ravage-California-Donald-Trump-threatens-to-cut-off-fire-management-funds
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CA Burns, 9 Dead & Shitstain Threatens To Cut Off Funding: "Remedy Now Or No More Fed Payments!" (Original Post) hatrack Nov 2018 OP
Proving he's a "globalist" SHRED Nov 2018 #1
No he can't! lark Nov 2018 #2
Way to go "president of all the people"... brush Nov 2018 #3
THOSE. ARE. FEDERAL. FORESTS. RockRaven Nov 2018 #4

lark

(23,081 posts)
2. No he can't!
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 11:40 AM
Nov 2018

He thinks he's already dictator since that's what he wants and plans on making happen. He's got his pet SCOTUS and thinks they will cover up any breaks with the constitution he makes and that he can commit any crime he wants and nothing can be done because of the absolute sycophantic rw devotion of 4 of the (in)justices.

brush

(53,759 posts)
3. Way to go "president of all the people"...
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 11:50 AM
Nov 2018
.

With trump in office I get why some in California wonder if they'd be better off as their own country.

RockRaven

(14,950 posts)
4. THOSE. ARE. FEDERAL. FORESTS.
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 01:03 PM
Nov 2018

If you're going to blame the party which got the money, blame Ryan Zinke, you bloated piece of crap.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»CA Burns, 9 Dead & Shitst...