Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,583 posts)
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 08:46 AM Dec 2018

Coast Guard Has 2 (Barely) Operational Icebreakers, Needs Six; Funds May Be Diverted For The Wall

EDIT

It has just two operational icebreakers, and experts in and out of the Coast Guard agree that isn't enough to fully support the nation's interests in the polar regions, where climate change is rapidly increasing the need for a robust presence. Only one of those ships—the Polar Star—can break the thickest ice, and it's 12 years past its expected end of life. And its mission is in Antarctica, not the Arctic, where temperatures are rising most dramatically and where the melting of the ice is most challenging as global warming opens up new channels of commercial and military opportunity.

The Coast Guard's most recent review found that it needs six new icebreakers—three heavy icebreakers and three medium class—to fulfill its mission, and that it needs one delivered as soon as possible to replace the Polar Star. It will take years to design and build replacement icebreakers and will cost billions of dollars. Despite decades of warnings from studies and blunt congressional testimony, and considerable bipartisan political support, progress has been painfully slow. Efforts to grow the icebreaker fleet began under the Obama administration, and, in a rare example of continuity, gained momentum under President Donald Trump. But Trump's mercurial nature has left the Coast Guard's advocates unsure of how steadfast his support is.

Now, as a lame duck Congress returns to Washington, lawmakers face a crucial decision: whether to approve $750 million for the construction of a new icebreaker or to divert those funds for the construction of a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico. Congress has until Dec. 7 to settle the spending impasse or face a partial government shutdown.

"America's only heavy icebreaker, the Coast Guard Cutter Polar Star, is more than 40 years old and must be replaced by the new Polar Security Cutter," said Vice Adm. Daniel B. Abel, U.S. Coast Guard deputy commandant for operations. "We need the first new Polar Security Cutter immediately to meet America's needs in the Arctic."

EDIT

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/03122018/national-security-arctic-icebreaker-funding-emergency-climate-change-coast-guard-military-readiness

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Coast Guard Has 2 (Barely) Operational Icebreakers, Needs Six; Funds May Be Diverted For The Wall (Original Post) hatrack Dec 2018 OP
Icebreaker or Wall? How many brain cells does it take? TreasonousBastard Dec 2018 #1
Apparently they lack the sufficient amount of them...nt 2naSalit Dec 2018 #2
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Coast Guard Has 2 (Barely...