Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum20 Years Since Removal Of Edwards Dam On The Kennebec River (ME) - And How Much Has Changed Since
EDIT
During the 1980s efforts to improve fish passage at dams and water quality in the river continued. Even though many environmental groups thought dam removal was the best ecological hope for restoring the Kennebec, few believed it was a winnable campaign. At that time removal of dams was a pretty outlandish concept and most people who we were interacting with did not see us prevailing, says Pete Didisheim, senior director of advocacy at the Natural Resources Council of Maine.
The only other talk of dam removal happening then in the United States was across the country on Washingtons Elwha River. (The Elwhas two dams wouldnt end up being removed, however, until 2011 and 2014.) In 1991 the owners of the Edwards Dam, Edwards Manufacturing Company, applied for a 50-year renewal license to operate it. The newly formed Kennebec Coalition jumped in to convince the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the agency in charge of the relicensing, to deny that permit. The coalition was made up of the nonprofits American Rivers, the Atlantic Salmon Federation, the Natural Resources Council of Maine, and Trout Unlimited and its Kennebec Valley chapter.
People began to not only imagine what dam removal would do for the benefit of the fish, but also what it would do for the benefit of the town if they had a functioning, free-flowing river running through it, says Andrew Fahlund, currently senior program officer at the Water Foundation, who was working for American Rivers during the push for dam removal. The coalition had a strong argument. The dam produced only 3.5 megawatts of power, providing less than 0.1 percent of Maines electricity. It employed only a few people and was aging and unsafe, having been breached numerous times. It blocked critical upstream fish habitat, including the migration of endangered sturgeon.
And a restored fishery would bring economic as well as ecological benefits profits that could be more widely shared than those of the small company that owned the dam. But taking down a functioning hydroelectric dam for the benefit of fish had never been done before.
EDIT
https://therevelator.org/edwards-dam-removal/
padah513
(2,500 posts)Thanks for the article