Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumChernobyl: The end of a three-decade experiment
"This place is more than half of my life," says Gennady Laptev. The broad-shouldered Ukrainian scientist is smiling wistfully as we stand on the now dry ground of what was Chernobyl nuclear power plant's cooling pond.
"I was only 25 when I started my work here as a liquidator. Now, I'm almost 60."
There were thousands of liquidators - workers who came here as part of the mammoth, dangerous clean-up operation following the 1986 explosion. The worst nuclear accident in history.
--more--
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-47227767
This accident demonstrated how humans going about their ordinary business are worse for the natural environment than fallout from a nuclear power plant accident.
And now humans are returning...
I'm quite serious.
If anyone here wants to save the world, there are a few ways to go about it, mostly involving human rights especially for women, realistic sex education, universal access to birth control, and a broad scientific education emphasizing literacy, numeracy, and respect for the natural environment.
The ordinary activities of ordinary humans are more damaging to the natural environment than, say, tritium from the accident at Fukushima.
As Pogo says, "We have met the enemy and he is us."
enough
(13,255 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,438 posts)Eko
(7,245 posts)This accident was from humans going about their ordinary business, right?
hunter
(38,302 posts)What's yours?
I think we can all agree RBMK reactors were a bad idea.
Their primary attraction was they were cheap, simple, and used unenriched uranium fuel. They were also somewhat attractive to the military as they had the capability of breeding plutonium, although it was generally cheaper to use specialized reactors and refining complexes for that, as the U.S.A. did, especially at Hanford.
Heavy water reactors, similar to Canada's CANDU, would have cost four times as much.
I don't romanticize modern agrarian lifestyles.
Many rural people are the sorts of assholes who recklessly shoot wolves and other wildlife and drench their land in toxic chemicals hardly any better than nuclear fallout. The natural environment is better off without them.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1127123863
I'm never going to cry for people forced out of environmentally destructive lifestyles.
If some pig or dairy farmers' kids in Iowa, Germany, or the Ukraine move away to the big city, for whatever reason, including nuclear accidents, I don't care if the farm is lost, I only hope there is a comfortable social safety net for those whose livelihoods have become obsolete.
My own great grandparents were all ranchers, pig farmers, and dairy people in the U.S.A. Wild West. They were all hunters. I've hunted and killed meat I've eaten, and yes, that's my actual name.
If meat and dairy products all went away tomorrow I wouldn't really miss it.
I'd rather feel some kinship with the wolves of Chernobyl.
Eko
(7,245 posts)Mine was "You do realize This accident was from humans going about their ordinary business, right?"