California GOPer Introduces Bill To Sidestep Coastal Commission, Allow Seawalls In SD, OC
EDIT
In a move this month that outraged environmentalists and caught coastal regulators off guard, a Republican senator pushed forward legislation that would revise a key section in the states landmark Coastal Act and allow homeowners in San Diego and Orange counties to build seawalls by right. These changes would set a precedent of sidestepping the required (and often tough) oversight of the California Coastal Commission, which for decades has walked the contentious line between protecting private property and preserving the very beaches that make California, well, California. Seawalls, while effective in protecting beachfront homes and infrastructure in the short term, are controversial because they disrupt the erosion and natural replenishment of sand stripping away beaches until they narrow or vanish altogether. For every new seawall protecting a home or road, a beach for the people is sacrificed.
Homeowners fighting sea level rise say going to the Coastal Commission for any form of protection has increasingly become a non-starter. This new legislation, supporters say, would streamline a frustrating permitting process that could ultimately save lives. They point to the bluff collapse in Encinitas last summer that killed three women. Make Southern Californias Coastal Bluffs & Beaches Safe Again, supporters of the bill, SB 1090, declared. The California Coastal Commission is failing us.
Opponents call the bill a thinly veiled attempt by the author, Sen. Patricia Bates (R-Laguna Niguel), to allow wealthy coastal enclaves to finally get away with armoring their own properties without considering the broader consequences. If public safety was truly the concern, there would be a number of other options on the table such as moving the structures themselves out of harms way, they said. Only an unimaginably massive seawall, one that no homeowner would ever propose, could prevent a total cliff collapse like the one in Encinitas.
Its an outrageous and reckless proposal that would destroy Orange Countys public beaches for private benefit, said Denise Erkeneff, who has lived in Dana Point for 25 years and coordinates the Surfrider Foundations South Orange County chapter. Efforts to protect public access to the coast will be for nothing if there is no coast or beaches left to visit.
EDIT
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-05-20/california-seawall-bill