Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThermochemical Carbon Dioxide Splitting With Oxygen Permeable Membranes to Effect Separation.
The paper I'll discuss in this post is this one: Thermochemical CO2 Splitting Enhanced by In Situ Oxygen Separation through CeO2 and CaTiO3Membranes, Liya Zhu, Heng Pan, Shaocong Chen, and Youjun Lu, Energy & Fuels 2022 36 (19), 12226-12235.
When my son entered his nuclear engineering Ph.D. program, I advised him, as a materials scientist, that if I were to suggest a goal, it would be to develop materials suitable to effect solid to gas heat transfer at temperatures higher than 1400°C. This is the temperature at which cerium dioxide, CeO2, decomposes to give Ce2O3, formally dicerium trioxide. The latter, at a lower temperature, can be reoxidized by carbon dioxide back to CeO2, whereupon the carbon dioxide is reduced to carbon monoxide, a gas that is very useful for making carbon free liquid fuels.
I discussed this topic, carbon dioxide splitting previously in this space, here: Cerium Requirements to Split One Billion Tons of Carbon Dioxide, the Nuclear v Solar Thermal cases.
In that post, now over four years old - using another unit of time, accumulations of carbon dioxide in the planetary atmosphere, 11.20 ppm of carbon dioxide ago; we were at 409.60 ppm when I wrote it - I made the following remark:
In my calculations, I compared the nuclear and solar cases, because they're illustrative, and nominally carbon free, if one ignores the fact that the worlds largest solar thermal plant there are actually very, very, very few of them as of 2018 - spends a significant portion of its operating time as a very, very, very expensive and unreliable gas plant.
The paper under discussion qualifies in the same way. It claims the source of heat for this process will be solar energy, which is just stupid, since any plant operating at the required temperatures to be economically viable will also need to be reliable, something solar energy isn't, since as should be obvious but somehow escapes attention, something called "night" exists.
But look, we live in a world where in order to get funding, one has to engage in quasi-religious chanting about so called "renewable energy" which is neither "renewable" nor environmentally acceptable.
I have been a regular reader of Energy and Fuels, a publication of the American Chemical Society, of which I am a proud and long term member, and am now a minor officer. The journal is largely devoted, not entirely, but largely to the development and use of dangerous fossil fuels, fossil fuels that are killing the planet while morons have been carrying on about Three Mile Island for close to half a century, or in climate change time, 81.62 ppm of carbon dioxide concentrations ago. It should be as obvious as the existence of "night" which is the worst disaster, Three Mile Island or climate change, but somehow it's not. As to why I read a journal largely devoted to dangerous fossil fuels, which I abhor, there are useful things in it that might be adopted to clean energy, and in any case, there's the famous cliched maxim: "Know thine enemy."
The journal specifically excludes discussion of the only sustainable form of energy there is, nuclear energy, but also excludes a worthless form of unsustainable energy, wind energy:
About the Journal.
So, if one wants to be published in Energy and Fuels, one has to get a little absurd. Nevertheless, thermochemical splitting of water and/or carbon dioxide - in many ways, owing to the existence of the water gas reaction they are equivalent - are worth reading.
Carbon dioxide has a certain value as a working fluid in Brayton cycle devices, and an intriguing concept in carbon dioxide Brayton cycle devices is the Allam cycle, an oxyfuel combustion cycle for which CO2 splitting could be considered a variant with a better heat source than combustion.
Anyway, the paper under discussion addresses a problem about which I've thought quite a bit. Most of the scientific interest in a class of structural compounds known as "perovskites" is currently built around the very bad idea of developing even more toxic solar PV cells, but my own interest in this class of compounds has been built around varieties of these structures to function as oxygen transport membranes.
What is interesting about this paper is not the carbon dioxide splitting itself - cerium oxides are well known to do this - but oxygen transport.
From the introduction to the paper:
One hears, probably too much about the allegedly "mature" idea of using the heretofore useless (if the goal is to address climate change as opposed to trashing huge land areas of wilderness to make industrial parks to produce insignificant amounts of energy) PV energy scheme to produce electricity which can then be used to make hydrogen or electochemically reduce carbon dioxide.
I like the sly dismissal of this pixilated scheme in this paper:
Thermodynamic inefficiency translates into environmentally disastrous in my opinion.
Later on in the introduction, the authors discuss mechanical Rube Goldberg schemes that have been offered to address the oxygen separation problem:
The authors then discuss their interest in solving the problem, oxygen transport membranes, discussing previous work:
...Besides, for CeO2, the strong reductive condition required on the reduction side may cause a high oxygen vacancy concentration, which may further lead to the lattice expansion and membrane crack. (36) From this point of view, using a membrane material with a higher oxygen affinity may provide a more effective option for this application. In this work, the performances of membrane reactors made from two distinct oxides, CeO2 and CaTiO3, are investigated and compared, upon which the rate-limiting mechanism of each membrane reactor and the difference on material requirements of the two reaction modes (two-step cycle and membrane reactor), are discussed.
Titanium is one of my favorite elements in the periodic table (although my son says that I refer to way to many elements as "favorite" elements). I had not heard of it as an oxygen transporting material; thus this paper interests me.
A few pictures from the paper:
The introductory cartoon:
The apparatus:
The caption:
Yields and gas behavior:
The caption:
Note that an industrial "Allam like" system would need to do away with the argon diluent.
The caption:
The caption:
Some conclusions from the paper:
An excellent paper if accurate; with heat recovery this type of process could go a long way to providing high efficiency clean energy with a nuclear fuel source.
Have a nice Sunday afternoon.
Backseat Driver
(4,390 posts)"end caps" on DNA strands get shorter with each replication via telomorase--To be a self-sustaining energy source in this analogy, that enzymatic maintenance would require replacement of some sort of osmotic membrane at some point. I read that fruit flies don't use this process but something else. Have these seemingly analogous processes been exploited (researched) in the material world as it does seem human and insect life energy depends on these processes for continued life energy or at least ending??? Anti-aging of bodily organs including neurons maybe equals immortality? (given self-sustaining cellular energy pretty much dependent on H20 balance)
Pardon my "uneducated" reading of your article; I pretty much skipped physics and chemistry in HS and took a basic Life Science college class in which I struggled with chemistry--Amazed myself with the B grade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomerase
eppur_se_muova
(36,259 posts)NNadir
(33,512 posts)...I did however, send the paper to my son.
He's finishing his first year of graduate school, and from what I understand, his advisor is giving him a lot of freedom to choose a topic for his research.
The lab he's in is engaged in additive manufacture, apparently at the level of nanolayering, and this sort of system might be targeted by such a technology.
He probably doesn't give a rat's ass what I say, and will follow his own scientific interests, but I thought I'd give it a shot at inspiring him in this direction.